|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
Neither 3173 or 3015 are going to St. Louis.
|
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
Top three Indiana teams:
868 (2 regional wins, #1 and #2 seeds, ridiculously agile cycler) 234 (1 regional win, 1 finalist, #2 and #3 seeds, quick, adaptable cycler) 1741 (FCS, good defender, can scoot under pyramid) Backup: 447 (1 regional win, 1 finalist, quick and agile cycler, can floor load) Something that's been overlooked in previous posts - all these teams are very deserving of high-profile awards at the CMP level. |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
For Illinois, I would say-
111-ground collection, pyramid shooter (1 regional win, 1 semi-finals, 3 seed at midwest) 2338-pyramid shooter (1 regional win, 1 semi-finals, 2 seed at midwest) 2481-climb and dumper (1 finals, 6 seed at crossroads) Neither pwnage or winnovation made it this year. Both of them had really solid bots. |
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
Sorry about that. I forgot about the St. Louis part, but they are one of the best in NY.
|
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
Quote:
|
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
imo we need someone to climb or play defense which is why i picked 2046. 1983 as a better auton than 1899 and ground pickup. And 2471 has ground pickup as well.
|
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
Michigan
Assume they can score all the disc: 78 Auton Points + 135 Disc Points + 70 Climb Points + 30 Pyramid Disc Points = 313 (or more because of taking the other alliance's disc) Now if 469 adds a lvl 3 Climber for the Championship, it becomes 333 Points. -Clinton- |
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
Quote:
And yes, 195's full court 3-point shot was just getting good by the end of the CT regional. Any 3 of the 5 CT teams already named would be a remarkable alliance with a 240+ non-foul point possibility per game. If only...but, If the Canadians can do it, why not, eh? |
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|