Make your Champs predictions!

[dodar]

Originally Posted by Justin Shelley

I think the FCS they should pick would be 1706. They have an amazing accuracy and can shoot at all three high goals while FCS though they only have a 10pt hang i still think they should be 2056's first pick.

They may be the better FCS but it will be hard to get a good 2nd/3rd level climber that can dump and is consistent; that is why everyone believes that if that is the direction 2056 wants to go with with their 1st pick, it will be either 67 or 148.

[Justin Shelley]

Originally Posted by dodar

They may be the better FCS but it will be hard to get a good 2nd/3rd level climber that can dump and is consistent; that is why everyone believes that if that is the direction 2056 wants to go with with their 1st pick, it will be either 67 or 148.

point taken but I believe a major reason to have a FCS is to draw defensive robots to your FCS instead of your cycler, 2056. Also a climb can be easily blocked by keeping the FCS away from the pyramid

[LDiDomenico]

Archimedes:254, 987, 1714
Curie: 2056, 67, 1816
Galileo: 118, 2169, 3481
Newton: 1986, 2826, 3476

Archimedes beats Curie
Galileo beats Newton

Archimedes beats Galileo

[Dinoyan]

Archimedes:254, 987, 78
Curie:67, 2056, 4564 (For Sure)
Galileo:1114, 118, 3481 (For Sure)
Newton:1986, 195, 217

[EricLeifermann]

Originally Posted by LDiDomenico

Archimedes:254, 987, 1714
Curie: 2056, 67, 1816
Galileo: 118, 2169, 3481
Newton: 1986, 2826, 3476

Archimedes beats Curie
Galileo beats Newton

Archimedes beats Galileo

I think newton would beat both Galileo and archimedes

[faust1706]

Originally Posted by Justin Shelley

Curie

1) 2056 OP Robotics

2) 1706 Ratchet Rockers

3) 4080 Team Reboot

[TheCrayButton]

Overal Champs for World this year,

1114, 118, 2512 from Galileo

[Abhishek R]

Originally Posted by TheCrayButton

Overal Champs for World this year,

1114, 118, 2512 from Galileo

2nd-ed.

[stephenmcd71]

Originally Posted by TheCrayButton

Overal Champs for World this year,

1114, 118, 2512 from Galileo

I love that alliance but I don't think 2512 would go that deep

[Anupam Goli]

Originally Posted by Justin Shelley

I think the FCS they should pick would be 1706. They have an amazing accuracy and can shoot at all three high goals while FCS though they only have a 10pt hang i still think they should be 2056's first pick.

67 trumps most in FCS ability. I think 948 and 2169 would be the only ones who theoretically could take on 67's FCS. However, a 50 pt climb added to that FCS and potential cycler sells 67 a lot more than other teams.

[nicholsjj]

This year could lead to some great story lines at champs(like always). With match strategy and scouting being at its highest, some predictions are better left a *bit more open. These are just fun predictions and they are my own and in no way are impacted from team 3885. I will probably be wrong on almost all of these, but it is fun to speculate.

A teams from south of the Mason Dixon line will win the WCA.
A full court shooter will win the EI Award.
A 7 disk auton will win the INC Award.
A person from north of the border will win the WFA.
This year has a nice probably of having more International than US teams on Einstein.

My Division Favorites:
Archimedes: 254-469-3245
Curie: 2056-67-16(Yes they could fall this far due to being inconsistent)
Galileo: 118-1114-3284
Newton: 1986-180-3756
A beats C, G beats N, and A beats G due to 118 running out of air.

"My Sleepers": (These teams are not getting talked about enough)
Archimedes: 2590-11-525
Curie: 1983-1918-1421
Galileo: 111-125-2481
Newton: 3476-217-1718
C beats A, N beats G, G beats C due to 111 having too much power drained from their LED's

Of course these predictions will more than likely become completely disproved during next week, but it is nice to guess. Also I have only seen three of the teams that I listed so this was complete guesswork on my part.

[robonerd]

I'm going to go off on a limb here and say I think that Archimedes will win. My prediction is that 987, 33, and 314 will beat 469, 254, and someone else in division finals.

[Gregor]

Originally Posted by nicholsjj

"My Sleepers": (These teams are not getting talked about enough)
Archimedes: 2590-11-525
Curie: 1983-1918-1421
Galileo: 111-125-2481
Newton: 3476-217-1718
C beats A, N beats G, G beats C due to 111 having too much power drained from their LED's

Ha.

[joelg236]

Originally Posted by nicholsjj

This year could lead to some great story lines at champs(like always). With match strategy and scouting being at its highest, some predictions are better left a *bit more open. These are just fun predictions and they are my own and in no way are impacted from team 3885. I will probably be wrong on almost all of these, but it is fun to speculate.

A teams from south of the Mason Dixon line will win the WCA.
A full court shooter will win the EI Award.
A 7 disk auton will win the INC Award.
A person from north of the border will win the WFA.
This year has a nice probably of having more International than US teams on Einstein.

My Division Favorites:
Archimedes: 254-469-3245
Curie: 2056-67-16(Yes they could fall this far due to being incontinent)
Galileo: 118-1114-3284
Newton: 1986-180-3756
A beats C, G beats N, and A beats G due to 118 running out of air.

"My Sleepers": (These teams are not getting talked about enough)
Archimedes: 2590-11-525
Curie: 1983-1918-1421
Galileo: 111-125-2481
Newton: 3476-217-1718
C beats A, N beats G, G beats C due to 111 having too much power drained from their LED's

Of course these predictions will more than likely become completely disproved during next week, but it is nice to guess. Also I have only seen three of the teams that I listed so this was complete guesswork on my part.

Was going to make my list, but I can't see anything there that I wouldn't agree with.

One team I'd add under sleepers in Galileo is 2337.

[Chris Hibner]

Originally Posted by nicholsjj

Curie: 2056-67-16(Yes they could fall this far due to being incontinent)

While being incontinent would be a horrible distraction, I can't imagine that would cause them to fall that far. Or do you mean they will lose their discs when they don't want to?

(Sorry, I couldn't help it. It was teed up too nicely.)