Quote:
Originally Posted by ferret_guy
parts. The only problem with it is the props, is that the prices make me sad  . My idea was to simply fly it very low after performing extensive static testing and whatnot. However by changing the props as EricH suggested the result was unable to lift off, could you provide more info on this?
|
The props... I ran the simulator with basically the settings you had, but a heavier frame and smaller props (no hover) and then the same size props (short flight).
Speaking from the fixed-wing world, the right prop, especially for high weight, is a tough balancing act. You're looking for thrust, but you get that from three factors that are all integral to the propeller or the engine: RPM, Diameter, and Pitch. Too high of a pitch, and the RPM suffers due to drag (engine doesn't quite have enough torque). Too large of a diameter, and the motor might not have enough torque to turn it fast enough. Either one can really hurt performance.
Now, if your motor is fixed (ours had to be a certain type), you can get a few props of various sizes and do some testing. You're primarily looking for thrust, which can be measured with, say, a skateboard, a mount, and a fish scale and a stake, but how much power the engine is exerting can also be handy (but needs a dynamometer to measure).
You need enough thrust to lift off using 4 motors; you want some runtime in the air... It's a tough problem, and the props are extremely critical. No substitute for testing. (And yes, good props are expensive. I think props for our testing could run $20 or more a pop, and we used cheaper ones.)
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons
"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk
