|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: How Important Are Blockers In UA | |||
| Very Important |
|
32 | 32.32% |
| Important |
|
49 | 49.49% |
| Mediocre |
|
13 | 13.13% |
| Not Important |
|
4 | 4.04% |
| Useless |
|
1 | 1.01% |
| Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
The hard part about being an amazing defender -- there's a very large chance that they'll be gone by the time the serpentine comes back around to the upper seeds.
In elims, I wouldn't be surprised to see an entire alliance comprised of robots that are easily able to delivery 26+ discs each -- so defense may be tricky. Last edited by JesseK : 21-04-2013 at 08:08. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
Quote:
![]() |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
While 1912 has been an offensive robot through our first two regionals, we are making some modifications to the robot, specifically adding a large net that will deploy up to 60" at the start of a match to block FCS, or to sit in front the other alliance's pyramid and forcing pyramid shooters to go on a corner.
Type and strength of drive-train: 2 AM Super Shifters geared at 30:1 and 7.5:1 with 6, 6" High traction wheels, belt driven. Expertise of Drivers: 2 years each Height and Strength of FCS blocker: 60", simple net to deflect discs Climb and/or Dump points: 10 points How good can you shoot?!?!: Make 18 in auto from corner, and can make 3-4 cycles in to 3 point goal. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
1781 has pretty good defense.
Drivetrain:4 CIM Andymark SuperShifters drop center tank. 6" Andymark wheels with high traction. Driver: Senior who has been the driver since his sophomore year. Blocker: A 59" blocker that can extend to 82". Also blocker is two-directional so we can block facing the FCS or perpendicular to the FCS (defending robots of FCS tend to turn robots with drop-center sideways). Climb: We climb for 10. Shooting: We score 3 in autonomous and are pretty decent in teleop. We had the seventh highest OPR at Midwest and I believe around the fourth or fifth highest discs scored during teleop. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
This is probably the only effective defense I have seen played on 1986:
http://www.thebluealliance.com/match/2013okok_qm21 |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
Well, you'll get a chance to see in Newton Quals 6...assuming this "preliminary" schedule becomes the "official" schedule.
|
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
They gotta stone both 1986 and 2826. That's a really tough assignment for any robot.
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
Quote:
![]() |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
Quote:
With around 100 teams per division and a 9 match schedule (?), your chance of going up against any other team in the division is just over 1 in 4. Your chance of being paired up with any other team in the division are under 1 in 5. You will never see over half the teams in the division during qualification matches. (Edit: Nevermind about the "preliminary schedule" - I see the blogpost) Last edited by Wayne TenBrink : 22-04-2013 at 13:21. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense at Championships
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|