|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#196
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
G30 preventing a climb, both times it seems. 1114 awarded full 30 point climb as well.
|
|
#197
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
So many high-profile matches lost because of Technical Fouls...
|
|
#198
|
||||
|
||||
|
WOW! Team 610 heads to the finals! Ontario and the Lone Star state looking for Einstein!
Amazing play and hats off to all the teams! Congrats to Crescent School and Team 610! |
|
#199
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
I think it's time for the feather boas to come back
|
|
#200
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
1241, 1477, and 610 are heading to Einstein!
|
|
#201
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
What a ride it was! 3 Quarterfinal Matches, then 3 Semifinal Matches (Texas & Ontario bracket) Thank you to all the Canadian teams watching and supporting Canada
Einstein here we come! |
|
#202
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Wow, that was completely unexpected. I was definitely expecting 2169's alliance to win that one.
Congrats to 610, 1241, 1477 on an awesome win. |
|
#203
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmm...Galileo match results aren't loading on FRC's site...a 404 error. Good thing I'm also watching Twitter and know how it turned out!
|
|
#204
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Try again, they're working fine for me.
|
|
#205
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#206
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#207
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Quote:
|
|
#208
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
so now that the battle is all said and done. Dose anyone know of a place where i can find all the matches recorded from our field? if so could you please link me to it thank you so much
|
|
#209
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
I agree with this. While it's not written in black and white as a foul, I felt it would make sense to call this as interfering with an oponents climb.
|
|
#210
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Quote:
No, it's not specifically called out as a foul. I can't think of a way to call it as one, either. UNLESS... you could make the argument, somehow, that the transitory property ascribed to the Pinning rule (that is, if there's an object between pinner and pinnee, it's still a pin) also applies to contact with a robot attempting to climb its tower. That would be the only way to even have a chance at calling it, unless someone can dig up a Q&A that says otherwise. Now, that doesn't seem quite right--after all, they're still interfering with a climb--but that's the way it works. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|