Einstein 2013

[JackN]

Feels like Deja Vu from 2007 for some reason, I think Newton wins in three.

[dellagd]

Originally Posted by Gaurav27

Via FRCFMS on Twitter:
@frcfms " #FRCCMP TY E MC 4 RF 254 BF 225 RA 3476 1640 303 BA 1241 610 1477 RC 30 BC 30 RFP 0 BFP 0 RAS 60 BAS 54 RTS 164 BTS 141

Galileo had ~13 /14 (156-168 pts) cycles combined, I'm sure Newton did not score 7 cycles / robot (84 points each between 303 & 3476).

Link to my post on another thread

I totally agree, it doesnt add up.

But if it is wrong, can Galileo do about it now?

EDIT: They re-scored it and Galileo won. Math prevails. Actual score is Red: 200 Blue: 225 (Waiting for it)

[Steven Sigley]

oh my..... replay of Newton and Galileo...

[Marc S.]

Galileo beat Newton in SF2-2. Now playing match 3. Actual score unknown.

[Gregor]

SF 2-2 was 225 to 200 for Galileo.

[Brandon_L]

Originally Posted by Steven Sigley

oh my..... replay of Newton and Galileo...

It wasn't a replay, it was match 3.

Galileo beat Newton in SF2-2. Now playing match 3. Actual score unknown.

My question is, where did they get the score from? The field has been cleared and there was a match inbetween. In all fairness, the second match should have been replayed.

Side note, this is Einstein. If we can hand count at Hatboro why can't we hand count at Einstein?

[Brandon_L]

Originally Posted by DevenStonow

They definitely had to have hand counted, but the question is how they got it SO WRONG, and how they got one side right, but one side wrong.

Heard from a few places that they weren't. Can't confirm though.

At least at the events I've been to, there were different volunteer groups scoring each side.

Also, how were they able to verify the right score, as well as verify that the (real) score was right?

My point exactly

[Grim Tuesday]

I am watching Einstein from far above and they are definitely hand counting.

[Kaushal.K]

Originally Posted by Brandon_L

My question is, where did they get the score from? The field has been cleared and there was a match inbetween. In all fairness, the second match should have been replayed.

Disc scored are always counted by hand. Especially in elimination matches. I doubt Einstein is done any differently. Also after each goal is counted, the number of discs are recorded.

Thus a recount is not always required, if it's merely an input error on the system to confirm the number of discs vs how many the real time scoring system shows.

[Brandon_L]

Originally Posted by Kaushal.K

Disc scored are always counted by hand. Especially in elimination matches. I doubt Einstein is done any difference. Also after each goal is counted, the number of discs are recorded.

Thus a recount is not always required, if it's merely an input error on the system to confirm the number of discs vs how many the real time scoring system shows.

Makes sense.



Safety FIRST, folks

[MrForbes]

Go Galileo!!!

[Steven Sigley]

Very competitive on Einstein.

One more match:

Winner takes all.

[Joe Ross]

Originally Posted by Brandon_L

That was Dave's best impression of 842's climb

[Joe Ross]

Talk about evenly matched, 33 469 1519 have scored 395 and 1241 1477 610 have scored 394.

[EricH]

Originally Posted by Gregor

Einstein discussion here.

33-469-1519(A) vs. 1678-148-862(C)

1241-1477-610(G) vs. 303-3476-1640(N)


Archimedes beats Curie in 2.

Galileo beats Newton in 3.


Galileo beats Archimedes in 3.

Prophetic. The only thing missing on this was the Archimedes/Curie matchup going to 3 instead of 2.