|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
---Disclaimer--- I hold the Thunder Chickens in the highest regard and don't think anything malicious happened. ---Disclaimer--- I've read some of the really hateful and sarcastic posts, as well as Paul's explaining the situation. The only question I have left is why, if 217 was so disabled that they were telling teams explicitly not to pick them, why then did they not decline the selection? What they did in the pits was tantamount to the same thing as declining during selections so if they were willing to essentially decline, why did they not actually? The assumed (assumptions make an $@#$@#$@# out of u and me) conclusion is that either of their two alliance partners had some inside knowledge that no one else in the division knew that led to these two picking them. I think the most likely explanation is that they didn't think they would get their robot working and made some miraculous repairs, which coincided with the alliance captain either choosing foolishly or bravely. But it has to be admitted that it leaves some very interesting questions. Last edited by Grim Tuesday : 28-04-2013 at 23:34. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
I too hold 217 in the highest regard and have personally never seen anything at a competition that would make me think differently.
That said, the one voice I would very much like to here regarding this matter (because I don't think anyone from this team has said anything yet pertaining to the subject) is that of team 1538, The Holy Cows; the team that actually drafted them. If anyone would know about how much 1538 actually knew about the Thunderchickens' damages, I'd be 1538 themselves. <speculation> My initial guess is that when told the robot was irreparable, someone from from the 1538 camp went over and investigated exactly how bad the damages were and personally assessed the probability of a successful repair (I mean, that's what my team would do, and were not even close to Chairman's caliber). If anyone could fix said fallen robot in time for the playoffs, I think the current World Chairman's Award Winner might be on that short list. [sidenote: Congrats btw on said achievement] That would personally give me the confidence to make such a risky selection. Sadly, I did not personally see the match where said fall occurred, however I did see the last match where they sat dead in, and I hadn't the clue what was going on. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Quote:
If other teams ever face situations like this, I think what Joe said could be valid. Take the chance and pick the team. If you think you need them to win. If they are the ideal bot. You pick them, and you get their bot functional. Take the risk. As Paul said in the other thread, if you have something to say, say it with a real account like the OP did. Do not hide under the veil of anonymity. People can not trust an anonymous source for information usually, and the person/team in question doesn't really have to answer. That said, I hope whatever went on, if anything, can be resolved within the team. To the other captains; don't dwell on the issue, it won't change anything, and in the end if "ifs and buts were candy and nuts..." Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 29-04-2013 at 00:11. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Since clicking over to the other thread before lobbing base and offensive accusations seems to be too much trouble, I'll just copy two highly relevant posts over here:
Quote:
Quote:
I'd just like to point out that you're accusing the 2013 CCA winners and a former WFA (Paul Copioli) of pulling a ridiculous stunt that anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows is wrong. Do you really honestly think that the Thunderchickens want to win THAT badly? The explanation offered by Paul is more than adequate and is, frankly, something that happens a lot. My team was the beneficiary of a similar #1 pick in 2007. We weren't working a bit all Friday but pulled some magic that night and had a perfect double lift Saturday morning. We actually didn't bother telling anyone anything cause we were certain we wouldn't be picked, and 1114 snatched us up as a sleeper. I'd love to say we went on to win the regional, but we had some unrelated mental lapses that dropped us in the semis, but still. To anyone not paying attention, a completely busted robot magically works flawlessly come elims. The 217 situation was only a little more extreme in the timing of everything. *Because when wrestling a pig, everyone gets muddy, but the pig likes it. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Quote:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=22 Now, that post is from a valid account, a mentor, and someone who did not offer an angry post. All that can be done at this point is to let 217 to worry about 217. As I said, I hope they do look into it on their own and can find out what was up. And I'll repeat, other captains should forget about the incident. Move on and have a fun offseason. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Mr. Copioli made it clear in his post in the closed thread that he will not be addressing this issue further, and I won't speak for him.
We were the 15th seed in the Newton division, and Paul Copioli came over to us while we were waiting in the practice goal queue to tell us that 217 had fallen off the pyramid, that they were broken, and to cross them off our pick list. After we'd gotten back to our pit, I had the opportunity to talk to him further about both our efforts to climb, and specifically the problems that had plagued 217 all season. It was around this point that 217 had mostly vacated their pit, and Paul explained that even though he advocates a "never say die" attitude, it was about time to shut it down. He expressed to me that if they were picked, they'd do everything in their power to fix their robot and do what they could on the field. Your team might make the decision that once broken, you'd decline any selection (which would likely be FRC190's decision under the circumstances). It's not unreasonable to assume that Paul and his team are full of pride for their machine and their abilities, and that they'd try their darndest to compete. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Dude, I got Paul Copioli's signature AND a piece of advice. Yeah, really.
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
I have nothing else to add. To reiterate my earlier post, the pick offered both huge risk and reward. We were gutsy to go for it, and we ended up getting our butts kicked in the finals for it (no disrespect to 217).
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Quote:
By that point, fixing 217's robot before eliminations was probably like business as usual for 1986. ![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
One thought that hasn't been said in these threads is that 1538 made an extremely risky pick with some very high level teams still on the board. 180(last years champion), 1985, and 2439 were all there. These three teams had all been major players in a regional championship and they were all working at full force. The fact that 1538 would pick a broken 217 bot over these three teams probably cost them a major shot at Einstein because as Connor has said 217 did rebreak during eliminations. The fact of the matter is that 217 told everyone that they had a major problem and the cows took a chance on it and it cost them. Does anyone from either 1538 and 1986 want to explain the thought process EDIT: (after rereading please know that this question didn't mean to sound this acusing: I just want to learn how elite level teams go through a tough decision like this) that went into the pick and if you also considered bringing 2439 in as a backup during finals? I think that would ease the minds of many people. I also think there was no "backroom" field playing going on I actually apuald 217 for being honest with the top 15 instead of telling teams "we are 100%" like most teams would do going into alliance selections. I truly believe that they didn't know if they could get their problems fixed.
Last edited by nicholsjj : 29-04-2013 at 00:53. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
While this is an important issue to discuss, accusing others of "Ungracious professionalism" is both cliché and rather inflammatory. Perhaps I shouldn't be the one to throw stones, as I've put my own foot in my mouth a large number of times, but while you have an important point to raise, I don't think that was to way to do it. GP is thrown around a lot now, usually in the context of "I'm more GP then you."
I agree that the situation seems a little fishy at first glance, but I'd be inclined to believe the respected mentors who gave their first hand accounts of their experiences. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
They demonstrated some great defense and prevented a climber from reaching their pyramid in the quals. Combine that with FCS ability, and we thought that we would potentially be able to take on 1114, who we expected we would face if we won our division. We thought that between ourselves and 1986, we had a large enough lead in offensive strength over the rest of the bracket to pick up any slack in scoring if the FCS wasn't working 100%. We were proved wrong.
Edit: See also Jon's post. Last edited by connor.worley : 29-04-2013 at 01:38. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
In response, my team is not at all bitter about this, in fact we're extremely ecstatic we made it to championships, let alone being an alliance captain. That was an amazing experience!!! We just found it suspicious when we were told try fell from the pyramid, and we hadn't seen tem climb, and were then picked by the #1 alliance. We are not making any accusations or trying to ruin the reputation of a team, just looking for a few answers.
Seriously though, championships was an incredible experience, thank you all so much!!! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|