|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#91
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
|
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
The teamwork required to synchronize trips to and from the feeder station with three cyclers still astounds me. The rotation of defense was perfect, this was a strategy not expected (no true defender to block an FCS, as 610 never used their blocker and 1477 was just raising their shooter). Then the attempts to sut down 1114's climb (unfortunately got several foul points in the first match, but at least they recognized the threat). How 610 dropped that low in the draft, I have no idea but that just sealed the deal to gt three amazing bots like themselves on the same alliance. I wonder how IRI will turn out to be...
|
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
Especially in the case of Code Orange, I have no doubt that their pre-cmp OPR was highly unrepresentative of their actual performance. |
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
Archimedes: 179.9 Curie: 189.9 Galileo: 146.7 Newton: 185.9 Obviously, OPR told us nothing about anything at all, as usual. |
|
#95
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
|
|
#96
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
Now to try and put my thoughts together on this weekend... Last edited by Jonathan Norris : 28-04-2013 at 23:06. Reason: Thanks Joe! |
|
#97
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
Very true, I could not believe that you 3 ended up on the same alliance, every one of your robots was amazing at everything it did, you all ran cycles at break-neck speed and had incredible scoring consistency, you guys had one heck of an alliance. |
|
#98
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Thanks team 100 for the shout out. In our early days, you were an inspiration to us and we still have a very high regard for your team. It was a great honor for our team to be able to compete on Einstein and also to be joined by such class teams as 148 and 862. We look forward to seeing you guys at Cal Games.
|
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Sorry, what is a rubber match?
Quote:
|
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
It's the deciding match when the series is tied (in our case, the third match of an eliminations pairing). The term actually comes from a card game called bridge.
Last edited by vhcook : 29-04-2013 at 11:07. Reason: wrong word |
|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
I appreciate the explanation. My concern with this is the psychological boon to G and bust to N. That makes a difference even though it's virtually impossible to calculate and certainly had to affect the 3rd match.
I can accept the possibility of human error, however it goes back to the whole issue of the difficulty of scoring this year. It's been problematic from the start and I hope that FIRST will work hard to improve a scoring method for whatever next year's game turns out to be. Quote:
|
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Ha, yes! Is there a like button for this post?
Quote:
|
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Thank you!
Quote:
|
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
|
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein 2013
Quote:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...4&postcount=70 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|