Dominant teams who are not as dominant as they used to be

[MikeE]

Originally Posted by Brandon Holley

IMO this thread is in bad taste.

I am fine with pointing out teams who have ok performances in the past and really stepped up in the past few years. However, going the other direction seems rude and a bit unnecessary.

Teams peak and valley for numerous reasons. I'm sure any team who may fit into this category is aware of their current performance versus their legacy.


Just my $.02 on the matter.


-Brando

I see your point but there are lessons to be learned from teams following both trajectories.

If this thread offers the opportunity for teams to offer up their stories of why robot competitiveness has decreased, then the community can benefit from this information.

However "nominating" teams that others perceive have declined is definitely too disrespectful for my tastes.