|
|
|
 Dangit Jim, we are engineers not politicians. - Andrew Schreiber [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Dangit Jim, we are engineers not politicians. - Andrew Schreiber [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
31-01-2003, 19:37
|
||||
|
||||
|
They are optimized for 1 meter(believe it or not). Our team looked them up in a book on sensors(disclaimer this information was gleaned several weeks ago. My memor is not the best). However, I think the minimum distance is however close you can get whatever to the sensor.
|
|
#3
31-01-2003, 21:12
|
|||
|
|||
|
The range is affected by the reflectivity of the target (these sensors can spot tape at 15 feet, but cannot see my hand at four inches when set to detect a white paper on a red broadloom at 5 inches.
|
|
#4
31-01-2003, 22:06
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Check here for a full description, but you will see that the sensor can operate out to 20 feet. The diameter of the sense changes with distance but at less than 5 feet the beam diameter is less than 50mm. Remember that this type is designed to be used with a retroreflective target so any other target material will affect response. There is also a gain control on the side of the sensor that you can adjust if the sensitivity is high. Check this at the Banner website.
Part # Qs18Vn6LV http://www.bannerengineering.com/pdf/63689.pdf |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
optimum sensing distance for sensors
Linear Mode
