|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
This isn't really a complaint, but in most matches in the events that I was at/watched, the announcer uses the phrase "pre-programmed instructions" to describe autonomous mode. Also, the check to see if the alliances are ready is useful. Just because a team's robot is connected doesn't mean that they have selected their auto mode on the smart dashboard. I've seen them start without everybody ready only twice, but it would be a good thing to bring back.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Quote:
Also, I dunno if it applies to other regionals, but the two I drove at this year, if you held up a thumbs down they'd wait for you. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
There's nothing wrong with pre-programmed instructions, but it gets a little repetitive to hear "In autonomous mode robots operate under pre-programmed instructions and score double points!" every time your match starts. Thinking back to it, it was only at one of the events that this was said every time.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Quote:
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Quote:
That'd make the entire match pre-programmed. XD |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Yes pre-programmed but not controlledb
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Cylinders are not fun to design for or inspect. A nice rectangular size constraint would be much easier on everyone involved.
The inconsistency between inspections at regionals (this is always something), but particularly shooter guards this year. This shouldn't be up to the LRI. It should have at least been adressed (one way or the other) after week 1 at the latest. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Quote:
-Max point-to-point distance on the robot -Maximum extension from each side of the frame -Max dimensions of a rectangular prism |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Quote:
For bumpers, I like to feel the bumpers and push on them to make sure of their construction and ensure they are secured to the frame. However, not every RI does the hands-on-the-robot approach when it comes to bumpers. Why do I have to feel the bumpers and push on them? Why can't I just look at them? We want every team out on the field competing in their matches. It is our job to help the teams get out there on time and be successful; however, there is also a limit to what we can do in a few hours vs what the robot rules stated 6 or more weeks prior. Thus, I'm going to have to ask you all to meet us half way. I am going to suggest that each team have a seasoned student compliance lead that goes through the rules and checklist criteria comparing them to the actual build of the robot to ensure compliance to the rules prior to bagging the robot. I say this because we have seen several cases where the team assumed the rules had not changed from the previous year and went to town on their build resulting in a very noncompliant robot showing up at a regional. Knowing this happens frequently, we have offered as well as other super experienced teams have offered to inspect the robots for compliance prior to bag and tag. Unfortunately, we do not get many takers of this valuable service. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|