|
|
|
 But if we just re-play "Triple Play" then what in the world will the Game Design Committee do with all that new-found free time? Since they wouldn't have to come up with a new game, they would have to concentrate on other things - like how to enforce the proposed "no metal on robots" rule. - dlavery [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
07-05-2013, 01:33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Saving Seats Epidemic
What about a compromise: "your team may save n seats per m team representatives currently seated adjacently"?1
I think that in many venues, n = 1, m ≥ 3 would satisfy the people who are desperately hoarding the best seats in case a few more members of the scouting team show up. In the less-populated sections (e.g. upper bowl seating at the Championship, except at Einstein), n = 1, m ≥ 1 would be fine. 1 Yes, I know there are issues with overlapping groups and the definition of adjacency. Last edited by Tristan Lall : 07-05-2013 at 02:41. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode