|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Massive Hit
No matter how skilled a welder, there are material properties to consider.
In extruded form it would have been 6061-T651: tensile strength of about 45ksi and yield of 40ksi. After welding is in the -T0 condition: tensile strength of about 18ksi and yield of 8ksi. Eventually 6061 will age back to T4 or so, which is pretty close (70%), but it requires heat treat to get to T6/T651 strength levels. Compared to the base (original) material, a welded area in aluminum can be a significant weakness that needs reinforcement. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Massive Hit
Quote:
Quote:
I would prefer an open root weld in this situation over a bevel, less prep effort and virtually no chance of a LOF defect. I say having written WPSs and earned an AWS certification in TIG welding aluminum. Quote:
Also, as mentioned by three_d_dave, welded material is generally weaker and needs the extra material provided by the weld bead even with full penetration. This is what a single-sided, single-pass aluminum weld should look like: ![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Massive Hit
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Massive Hit
For extra overkill points, the next time a welder says that, you can send the part off for ultrasonic inspection to see if it really does have plenty of penetration.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Massive Hit
Quote:
Heck, even a mirror to get a look at the back of the weld... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|