|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
One more thing, how much compression was typically run with these wheels on the disks?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
We had to run probably 3 times as much compression with this wheel than we did with the blue banebots wheel it replaced. I don't know what that is in absolute terms, but it was a lot.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
It should be mentioned that we were running them at much higher speeds, since ours were turned down to 2-7/8" to match the BB wheels they replaced.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Quote:
What rpm would you say is the breaking point of the wheels? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Can't speak for 254, but ours, at 60A durometer, never wore and never had to be replaced (unless they exploded).
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
What was the advantage of these over the Banebots wheels of the same hardness?
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
No exaggeration, in the context of this season they pretty much last forever. Our practice bot has shot easily over 10,000 frisbees and the wear is insignificant.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
To further prove this point, our banebots wheels would shred. When we switched to the MC wheels we started getting a thin film of plastic on the wheels.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Any comment on approximate RPM it takes to break the suckers as Cory mentioned?
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Quote:
We ran the blue at 10 krpm and poked it with an aluminum shaft a few times. Also took ~ 100 shots at this rpm over the course of the season. Never failed a blue. I'm not comfortable saying it's safe to run 10 krpm as we didn't really give it a fair and realistic lifecycle test. I'm very comfortable saying that with a concentric hub 6k rpm is fine indefinitely. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
As T^2 already mentioned our wheels did not wear at all, instead the plastic form the frisbees actually got melted/caked onto the wheel. You'll probably run out of frisbees before you wear down these wheels. At their off-the-shelf diameter I would not recommend running them at more than ~8,500rpm for more than ~10 seconds as they will literally tear themselves apart as previously mentioned.
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Quote:
I think the reason these wheels fail is largely a function of time. When prototyping we ran a 4" 1:1 off a 550 for a few seconds and the wheel was fine. Every we shot our wheel would expand considerably, and the stress of the repeated expansion coupled with how fast we were running the wheel was what caused it to fail. Like I said the failure is a function of time, not just speed. I believe the urethane wheels are bound to fail at some point when run at FRC speeds. There's no magic rpm that they fail at, it's just a question of how long you want them to last. If you run them at 10,000 rpm or slower they'll probably last a season, anything faster and you're pushing your luck. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1114 and 2056's shooter wheels
Quote:
At 2-7/8" we ran them up to 13,000 RPM with no problems, though our normal operating speed was around 10,500 rpm. That works out to almost 10,000 surface feet per minute. The same surface speed for the 4" wheel would be roughly 9000 RPM, though it's going to expand more and give you a higher effective surface speed. I know 233 accidentally ran a 4" one up to 13,000 and it exploded nearly immediately. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|