Go to Post Welcome to FIRST. You've never seen anything like this. - Aignam [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy > Scouting
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-05-2013, 16:57
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,148
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: An improvement to OPR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citrus Dad View Post
I agree that the OPR is better than nothing--it still had a 0.91 correlation with our offensive scouting data. However, it tends to miss the outlier teams that may be hard to pick out otherwise. Our OPR was 27 points less than our actual offensive average--more than 50% off. But if your team has sufficient resources to calculate the OPR on the fly then you probably have enough to do full scouting. On the other hand, you might be relying on the OPR calculated with one of the apps tracking the competition, in which case then that's the best you have.

.....
Outliers happen. They tend to be worse if teams have a lot of variation, and the fewer the samples, the worse it is...

Being more than 50% off is rarer, but not unheard of. I once saw an OPR of 15 assigned to a team that had only competed in 2/8 matches. And they didn't score 60 points in those two matches...

Another killer of OPR is if a team that reliably does very well has a bad match with your team. For instance, in Archimedes, 469 ended up with an OPR over 80 points. they had a match where their shooter had an issue right from the start and I believe they only scored climb points. Unfortunately to their partners, the OPR calculations will likely penalize those other teams..

For these reasons, and many others, it is very important to scout.

OPR does accurrately though show that some teams are worth less than they score on average. Yep, you heard me right, there are many teams that are worth less than their average score. This is especially true of slow that used the middle shooting position to start their climb. While they would frequently get their 30 points, they would often cost the alliance many missed shots from cyclers that were 75%+ at taht position but 50%- from outside shooting positions. Yes, the climber did score 30 points, but the other two partners that usually put up 30 disc points, and only got 20 results in a -20 total points from them. Some of this if it occurs on a regular basis will get attributed to the climber team. This will also explain an imbalance if you summed the auton, disc points, and climbing OPR.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi