Go to Post However, the best responses come with patience. It might be a couple of days before you get a good answer or it could be 10 minutes. - Molten [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-06-2013, 13:07
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,042
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: gearbox calculator

Quote:
Originally Posted by apalrd View Post
For example, say we have a motor (Motor A) which produces 4 units of torque at 5 units speed. Another motor (Motor B) produces 1 unit of torque at 10 units speed. We gear motor B 2:1 relative to motor A such that they are spinning at the same speed when mixed, and the torque output at the mixed point will force motor A to produce 2x the power and torque of motor B, while consuming 2x the current.
That last part -- "while consuming 2x the current" -- is generally not true for different motors.

Generally speaking, if you gear Motor B to produce half as much mechanical power as Motor A at some operating point, it will not be drawing half as much current at that operating point.

Likewise, if you gear Motor B to draw half as much current at some operating point, it will not be producing half as much mechanical power at that operating point.




Last edited by Ether : 12-06-2013 at 13:49.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-06-2013, 15:04
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: gearbox calculator

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
That last part -- "while consuming 2x the current" -- is generally not true for different motors.
Yes and no.

Assuming the motors were both perfectly efficient (or identical efficiencies), then what I said would be true.

For the CIM and MiniCIM, this is roughly true (the miniCIM will contribute it's share relative to it's power potential), as they are nearly identical motor designs.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-06-2013, 16:51
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,042
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: gearbox calculator

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
That last part -- "while consuming 2x the current" -- is generally not true for different motors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by apalrd View Post
Yes and no.

Assuming the motors were both perfectly efficient (or identical efficiencies), then what I said would be true.

For the CIM and MiniCIM, this is roughly true (the miniCIM will contribute it's share relative to it's power potential), as they are nearly identical motor designs.
For the sake of students who may be reading I need to make a couple observations:
When I wrote "generally not true for different motors" it was not intended to include "nearly identical motor designs". I assumed that would be inferred but perhaps it should have been stated explicitly.

If two different motors have identical efficiencies at the chosen operating point, that would be a special case... not general. In general, the efficiencies of different motors will not be identical for an operating point selected based on current or power.
Your posts are usually very practical. I'm sure you did not expect your readers to infer you were discussing perfectly efficient motors.



Last edited by Ether : 12-06-2013 at 20:22.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi