Go to Post Pompous boasts dont get you anywhere. Results get your name on the book... - Jeremy_Mc [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Control System > Sensors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-06-2013, 08:29
nathan_hui nathan_hui is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan Hui
FRC #2473 (CHS Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 228
nathan_hui will become famous soon enoughnathan_hui will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to nathan_hui
Re: Best camera for vision tracking

OK. So this is kind of a question of math and goals. I ask about the resolution because it affects the pixel density at range. You should also consider the FOV (field of view) - that will affect what you can see, thus also affecting the effective pixel density of your target. 1080p usually means a 2.1 megapixel image (1920 x 1080 pixels). FOV is affected by your choice of lenses. If you have a small FOV, you can only see a small section of the field at any given moment, but you'll have excellent resolution for that section of field. If you have a large FOV, you'll be able to see more of the field in any given frame, but with less detail.

According to Logitech forums, FOV for the C516 is 74 degrees. That means +/-37 degrees (diagonal), or +/- 33.3 degrees in the horizontal. At 54 feet, a 71 foot wide target will fill the entire image (i.e. 27 pixels per foot, or 2.25 pixels per inch). With the usual 4 inch target, that means a nominal 9 pixel width (more likely 7-8 due to lens distortion and slight offsets)

Also, beware of your so-called 1080p resolution capability. According to the Logitech website, the camera will do video capture in 1080p, and video calling (i.e. real-time streaming of video) at 720p. You're probably not going to get the 1080p resolution without some really interesting tinkering. I suspect this is due to the datalink bottleneck (USB 2.0 isn't that fast, and 1080p video can get pretty big).

So realistically, you'll get 1.5 pixels per inch, or 6 pixel width on the reflective strip (720p imagery). I guess in this sense, the camera is ok. Question is, does your software interfacing work? Can you reliably get images in a timely fashion? If you can't, you've wasted either $135 or $50, depending on which device you decide failed.
__________________
Nathan Hui
B.S. Electrical Engineering, UCSD '16
FRC 2473 (CHS Robotics), Team Captain '12
FTC 4950, 6038
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:00.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi