Go to Post One thing that FIRST has given me ... Friends who care. - Arefin Bari [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 10 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 13:20
s_forbes's Avatar
s_forbes s_forbes is offline
anonymous internet person
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,156
s_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Maybe AM made it easier to attach super structures because teams typically need to attach super structures? Nothing can be implied with these kit frame details other than the robots will most likely be allowed to have wheels.

We loved the kit frame last year, it's great to see some improvements are being implemented. I'm hoping the transmissions are easier to get into than they were on the previous iteration, that's what gave us the biggest setbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 13:28
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
FRC #2641 (PCCR; Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,639
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_forbes View Post
Maybe AM made it easier to attach super structures because teams typically need to attach super structures?
but...but...reality without wild suppositions is so much less convivial!

This is silly. Obviously, the point is that all robots will have to be both long- and wide- simultaneously. In fact, they'll have to be entirely symmetrical, because we're landing on the field like this* [/sarcastic wild supposition]


*Mars Pathfinder 40g "bounce" landing, if you don't want to click.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 15:44
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo View Post
It could be 6" wheels with 12.76:1 gearing or maybe 4" wheels with the 8.46:1 gearing option.

If it's 6" wheels, the gearbox options give the options of switching to 13 ft/s or 16 ft/s, at least.

It's too bad Toughboxes aren't setup with a 50:12 initial stage instead of 50:14. Then we'd also have the option of switching the first stage to 50:11 or 48:14 for a bunch more options.
If its 6" wheels, with the 10.71:1 ratio configuration, JVN's calculator drops out 10.51fps as the max speed.
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 15:50
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,124
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer26 View Post
If its 6" wheels, with the 10.71:1 ratio configuration, JVN's calculator drops out 10.51fps as the max speed
How do you know what "Speed Loss Constant" to use?


Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 15:57
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

I don't. I just assumed the 81% isn't wildly out to lunch. I'm also guessing that HQ/AM in saying "10.5fps" did some kind of calculation using commonly available tools -- likely JVN's calculator.
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 16:36
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,124
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option


Does anyone know where the 81% number came from?



Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 16:49
Madison's Avatar
Madison Madison is offline
Dancing through life...
FRC #0488 (Xbot)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,244
Madison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post

Does anyone know where the 81% number came from?



Two stages of gearing, each 90% efficient -- .90 * .90 = .81
__________________
--Madison--

...down at the Ozdust!

Like a grand and miraculous spaceship, our planet has sailed through the universe of time. And for a brief moment, we have been among its many passengers.
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 16:56
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,124
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madison View Post
Two stages of gearing, each 90% efficient -- .90 * .90 = .81
Are you sure that's not just a coincidence?

The "Speed Loss Constant" in cell I5 is independent of the gearing in cells C12 thru D15, or the Drivetrain Efficiency in cell J5.

.
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2013, 17:23
Nemo's Avatar
Nemo Nemo is offline
Team 967 Mentor
AKA: Dan Niemitalo
FRC #0967 (Iron Lions)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 805
Nemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer26 View Post
If its 6" wheels, with the 10.71:1 ratio configuration, JVN's calculator drops out 10.51fps as the max speed.
Looking at the blog again, I see that they're calling that an "estimated final drive speed," so I shouldn't have been looking at maximum theoretical speeds.

As an extra piece of information, last year they said this about the 2013 kit drive:
Quote:
The 2013 gearbox is a ToughBox Mini with 10.71:1 reduction. The estimated final drive speed is about 10 feet per second.
That drive had a 42:39 timing belt reduction, so the ratio was 11.53:1. If they used the 0.81 factor last year, they'd get around 9.75 ft/s, which they might have rounded up to 10 ft/s. Based on that I'd agree that they're very likely doing 6" wheels with 10.71:1 gearboxes. If not, they're estimating the speed differently this year.
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2013, 17:34
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,124
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
This constant is not computed within the spreadsheet from user-entered info about physical loads and motive forces in the drivetrain: you get the same 8.83 answer from the spreadsheet if you change the number of motors, stall torque of motors, the mass of the robot, or gearbox/drivetrain friction
Also worth noting: in the real world, the % of "speed loss" is not constant when changing gear ratios either:

Team 1678 did some testing earlier this year on a bot with a 2-speed gearbox. The "Speed Loss Constant" was 92% in low gear and 72% in high gear.



Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2013, 18:45
T^2 T^2 is offline
Registered User
FRC #5499
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 219
T^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
Also worth noting: in the real world, the % of "speed loss" is not constant when changing gear ratios either:

Team 1678 did some testing earlier this year on a bot with a 2-speed gearbox. The "Speed Loss Constant" was 92% in low gear and 72% in high gear.
Ether is correct on most accounts. Keep in mind that JVN's "speed loss constant" comes after a "drivetrain efficiency" (i.e. losses from gearing), therefore the 81% number cannot be attributed to gearbox losses. The testing we did earlier this year found the overall speed loss from the theoretical free speed of the motors. The numbers we found make intuitive sense, given that motor resistance, friction, rolling resistance, and air drag all tend to increase as speed increases.

My conclusion now is the same as it was then: test your drivetrain instead of blowing smoke from your behind about the theoretical speed you think you'll get.
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2013, 19:36
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,124
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by T^2 View Post
Keep in mind that JVN's "speed loss constant" comes after a "drivetrain efficiency" (i.e. losses from gearing), therefore the 81% number cannot be attributed to gearbox losses.
The Speed Loss Constant does not come "after" the drivetrain efficiency (at least not in the 2013 version). It is completely independent. See below:

Quote:
The testing we did earlier this year found the overall speed loss from the theoretical free speed of the motors.
^^This is exactly what the "Speed Loss Constant" in the JVN spreadsheet is.


Quote:
My conclusion now is the same as it was then: test your drivetrain instead of blowing smoke from your behind about the theoretical speed you think you'll get.
I love test data too.

But I still think it may be possible to develop a physics-based model that will reasonably predict overall drivetrain performance -- including not only top speed but also time to reach a desired speed, time to reach a desired distance, and accel, speed, distance, motor amps, motor volts, and Coulomb consumption versus time -- based on a priori estimates of a limited number of parameters .


Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2013, 20:05
BBray_T1296's Avatar
BBray_T1296 BBray_T1296 is offline
I am Dave! Yognaut
AKA: Brian Bray
FRC #1296 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 947
BBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankJ View Post
Wild speculations about what this means about the game.

First big assumption: You can build a competitive robot using the KOP chassis as designed.
Second implied assumption 6 in wheels based on stated speed.
Third implied assumption direct drive places the gear box center line on the wheel.

So with a 3" high nano box & 6" wheels, you have 1.5" ground clearance at the center of the robot. 8" wheels give you 2.5" of ground clearance in the center of the robot.

Leads to Big assumption based on this is no big obstacles the robot has to go over.

Wheels & stated speed also implies no water game. Again. Sorry guys.
What if the water is only 1" deep?
__________________
If molecular reactions are deterministic, are all universes identical?

RIP David Shafer: you will be missed


Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2013, 20:14
Whippet's Avatar
Whippet Whippet is offline
MIT Class of 2020
AKA: Luis Trueba
FRC #4301 (New Tech Narcissists)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 1,187
Whippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to Whippet
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBray_T1296 View Post
What if the water is only 1" deep?
Then that drastically reduces the coefficient of friction between the wheels and the playing surface, reducing the robot's ability to accelerate to the maximum drive speed, and possibly making it impossible to accelerate to 10 ft/s within the length of the playing field. However, they never said that the robot would be able to achieve that speed on the field. That was just the estimated speed.
__________________
2010: FRC 3043, Build Assistant
2011: FRC 3043, Head of Minibot subteam; FLL 12762, Team Captain
2012: FRC 3043, Electrical; FLL 12762, Team Captain; FTC 5670, Team Captain
2013: FRC 4301, Electrical, Team Co-Captain
2014: FRC 4301, Electrical/Programming, Team Co-Captain
2015: FRC 4301, Electrical/Programming, Team Captain
2016: FRC 4301, Chief Technical Officer; FTC 10860, 10861, and 11004: Mentor. Winner, Hub City Regional (3310 & 4063)
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-09-2013, 20:08
ErvinI ErvinI is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ervin Ibadula
FRC #0865 (Warp7)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Kincardine, ON
Posts: 144
ErvinI is just really niceErvinI is just really niceErvinI is just really niceErvinI is just really niceErvinI is just really nice
Re: FRC Blogged-Kit of Parts Drive System Option

I'm hoping that the dimensions are increased this year. The dimensions last year severely limited what teams could design (although it meant less clutter on the field). The fact that they somehow fit 6 wheels in a wide configuration makes me hopeful the dimensions are increased this year.

Has anyone tried modifying last year's wide 4-wheel KOP drive base in a 6 wheel base, keeping the same dimensions? This could answer the question of dimensions; if it's unfeasible or useless, then chances are that the dimensions could have been increased for next year.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi