Go to Post I tell my friends that the robot is the kids product and the kids are the mentors product. - rwood359 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-10-2013, 14:30
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,149
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Durability in FRC

As many new areas are going into District format, I would like to remind folks about designing for durability.

In the past, if you went to one regional, you could expect 8 qualifying matches and hopefully at least 4 Elims matches (making it to semis). Basically, you could plan on 12-20 matches.

Now, playing districts, you might see 12 qualifying, and have an even higher likelihood of making it into elims. Plus you will be doing at least 2 events which means a high likelihood of 30-40 matches. Plus another 12-20 if you make it to a district championship. plus another 20-ish if you play a third district. Plus another 12-20 if you make it to championship...

Last year FRC33 had 92 official matches at teh end of the World Championship. Throw in a few practice matches at each event, and they likely exceded 100 matches.

Then with offseasons, teams may see another 20-30 matches. Suddenly you have a need for a robot to last 150 matches instead of 15-ish...

Total run time changed from under 1 hour to around 7 hours.

What (if anything) are teams doing now that they are seeing a lot more matches?
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-10-2013, 14:44
BBray_T1296's Avatar
BBray_T1296 BBray_T1296 is offline
I am Dave! Yognaut
AKA: Brian Bray
FRC #1296 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 947
BBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

Our team generally tends to make things very durable (arguably too durable). Our frames are made to stand up to the most abuse imaginable (even a pyramid fall). We make our drive-trains low maintenance and easily swap-able (we usually have an entire fully assembled extra set of wheels/motors/gearbox/bracket assemblies on hand every regional). Our systems are independent and modular to allow for easy repair/replacement. We have generally been going to 2 regionals and an off season competition (worlds eludes us every year) and our robots end the season more than capable of spending 2-3x longer under stress.
__________________
If molecular reactions are deterministic, are all universes identical?

RIP David Shafer: you will be missed


  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-10-2013, 14:48
BrendanB BrendanB is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brendan Browne
FRC #1058 (PVC Pirates)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 3,103
BrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

During 2013 and going into 2014 we are keeping maintenance in mind.

This past year our shooter was very easy to maintain with an easy access panel for changing shooter wheels. Our shooter motors were mounted to a separate plate that we could undo four bolts to drop out the motors and swap it with a spare assembly if a motor died. Our climber was also attached using 3 bolts so a replacement was an easy swap.

Our drivebase wasn't the easiest to keep up over the course of two regionals, Champs, IRI, and 2 off-seasons so we are working on a simpler base that is reliable but makes it easy to replace parts.
__________________
1519 Mechanical M.A.Y.H.E.M. 2008 - 2010
3467 Windham Windup 2011 - 2015
1058 PVC Pirates 2016 - xxxx
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-10-2013, 14:50
colin340 colin340 is offline
human
AKA: Colin Nobles
FRC #0148
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: May 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: rochester
Posts: 432
colin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond reputecolin340 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to colin340
Re: Durability in FRC

We have been thinking more and more about useing easy to find parts. Light and costom is great but from autozone is often better.
__________________
61 77 77 20 77 69 74 74 6c 65 20 62 61 62 79 20 63 6f 6e 64 6f 72 20 69 73 20 72 65 61 64 69 6e 67 20 43 44
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-10-2013, 15:46
Mike Schreiber's Avatar
Mike Schreiber Mike Schreiber is offline
Registered User
FRC #0067 (The HOT Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 482
Mike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

This is one of the main reasons I argue for a practice bot. Not only does it provide spare parts when something inevitably breaks, it provides a much better sense of how much wear and tear your parts will see (just like a durability car). Practicing at least 4 or 5 hours a week (as most teams who build 2 robots do) means you've hit or exceeded your competition bots life cycle in 1-2 weeks. If the design failed after 5 hours of practice you know what you have to watch for on the real robot.
__________________
Mike Schreiber

Kettering University ('09-'13) University of Michigan ('14-'18?)
FLL ('01-'02), FRC Team 27 ('06-'09), Team 397 ('10), Team 3450/314 ('11), Team 67 ('14-'??)
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-10-2013, 22:07
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,007
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

Definitely a large increase in design for durability and maintainability. Ball bearings where bushings used to be enough, better wiring methods, and a focus on wear points.
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-10-2013, 23:12
P.J.'s Avatar
P.J. P.J. is offline
Proud Member of the Herd
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: US
Posts: 247
P.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond reputeP.J. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrendanB View Post
This past year our shooter was very easy to maintain with an easy access panel for changing shooter wheels.
This hits on a very important point IKE hinted at but didn't outright say. Yes you're competing in more matches, AND the turn-around between your matches is shorter. I know there have been times in Districts where we only had a four match break. So easy access for quick repairs is something we've started to highly prioritize.
__________________
P.J. Lewalski
Team 910-The Foley Freeze -- Student 2007-2010, Mentor 2012-2016
FRC Referee 2011-Present
Referee at 29 Regular Season Events, 3 World Championships, 24 Off Season Events, and Counting

  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 00:44
nathannfm's Avatar
nathannfm nathannfm is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan
FRC #3940
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 331
nathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant future
Re: Durability in FRC

After building FRC robots for years it still amazes me how cars, that only cost 4 times as much can stand up to 100's of thousand of miles of driving over years and still hold up reasonably well when our robots are always barely hobbling along by the last off season.
__________________

[2016-20??]: Mentor: FRC Team 3940"CyberTooth"
[2013-2016]: Mentor: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2012-2013]: Mentor: FRC Team 3929 "Atomic Dragons"
[2011-2012]: Mentor: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2008-2011]: Student: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2007-2008]: Student: FTC Team 365 "MOE"
[2005-2007]: Student: FLL Team "The MOEstangs"
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 00:55
MikeBrock MikeBrock is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: PA!
Posts: 33
MikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond reputeMikeBrock has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathannfm View Post
After building FRC robots for years it still amazes me how cars, that only cost 4 times as much can stand up to 100's of thousand of miles of driving over years and still hold up reasonably well when our robots are always barely hobbling along by the last off season.
I have only rarely seen robots that are "barely hobbling along" by the end of the season. Perhaps teams who experience this need to re-evaluate their construction methods?
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 01:20
Justin Montois's Avatar
Justin Montois Justin Montois is offline
FirstUpdatesNow.com
FRC #3015 (Ranger Robotics)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,347
Justin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Justin Montois
Re: Durability in FRC

A few things to consider first is that most of the parts FRC teams use are rated in industry to be used much longer then they will ever see in FRC. For example ball bearings have life ratings in the millions of rotations (As long as they are used within load and speed ranges) and pneumatics are rated in miles of equivalent travel. So we don't need to change much because we are already operating well within the expected life of those parts.

Bumpers also made a huge difference in longevity.

If I had to pick one thing, i'll echo what has been brought up already and that is access access access. But we should all be designing that way whether you plan on playing 20 matches or 200.
__________________
@jmontois340

Team 3015
2016- World Championship Finalists and Tesla Division Champions with 2056, 1690 and 1405
2016- Greater Pittsburgh Regional Chairman's Award
2016- Pittsburgh Regional Finalists with 1023 and 4050
2015- Newton Division Finalists With 195 and 1756
2015- Finger Lakes Regional Champions with 4039 and 378
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 03:36
nathannfm's Avatar
nathannfm nathannfm is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan
FRC #3940
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 331
nathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant futurenathannfm has a brilliant future
Re: Durability in FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeBrock View Post
I have only rarely seen robots that are "barely hobbling along" by the end of the season.
Maybe that wasn't the right phrase, but every team is always fixing something in the pits between matches and it just gets worse as the season goes on. Things you never thought would break break ect...
__________________

[2016-20??]: Mentor: FRC Team 3940"CyberTooth"
[2013-2016]: Mentor: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2012-2013]: Mentor: FRC Team 3929 "Atomic Dragons"
[2011-2012]: Mentor: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2008-2011]: Student: FRC Team 365 "MOE"
[2007-2008]: Student: FTC Team 365 "MOE"
[2005-2007]: Student: FLL Team "The MOEstangs"
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 07:10
Robo Hamsters Robo Hamsters is offline
Registered User
AKA: Matthew Vesperman
FRC #4466 (Robo Hamsters)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Culpeper, Va.
Posts: 85
Robo Hamsters is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Durability in FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathannfm View Post
Maybe that wasn't the right phrase, but every team is always fixing something in the pits between matches and it just gets worse as the season goes on. Things you never thought would break break ect...
Last year (our rookie year), during our regional, we never had to fix anything until elims.

Of course, during elims is when our slider attachment method broke. LOL.

At Worlds, we only had 1 instance where we had to repair some damage due to a crash with the pyramid. That doesn't mean we didn't have any problems at Worlds, but ours were almost entirely field/software issues.

For the most part our bot is still running at nearly 100%.

So going back to what the O.P. asked, if you design for durability you should have fewer issues.
__________________

FRC 4466
FTC 7042
=================
2013 Washington DC Regional Finalist
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 09:59
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,149
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathannfm View Post
After building FRC robots for years it still amazes me how cars, that only cost 4 times as much can stand up to 100's of thousand of miles of driving over years and still hold up reasonably well when our robots are always barely hobbling along by the last off season.
Nathan,
High volume production cars (50,000+/yr) work as well as they do for as long as they do due to testing, refinement, and good processes. Over the years, as problems arise, they build new tests to run cars through. For instance, several decades ago, there were a lot of suspension failures in a particular area of Mexico... So the proving ground engineers brought Mexico to Chelsea Michigan. Here is a link about them "Fixing the broken road" http://blog.chryslergroupllc.com/blo...=entry&id=1303
Cars will go through various "life tests" that attempt to simulate the life of a vehicle in a short timeframe. Sometimes these are referred to as "HALT" or Highly Accelerated Life Tests. In the short time span of developing a new car, they will run a couple iterations of early product through these tests in order to verify that they would be good for customers. For a car, there are thermal test, vibration tests, electrical interference tests, several different body/chassis durability tests, several component-subsystem-vehicle level powertrain tests....

They also had us (when I worked there), design for 150,000 miles. What that used to mean was for a normal distribution of failure modes, but the average part life was 150,000 customer miles. This typically meant few failures under 3 years/36,000 miles, but due to normal distributions, you would frequently have some issues creeping in around 90,000 miles. This is in part why a used car looses so much value around the 100K miles.

The final round of testing on "production" cars typically runs into the first 4-6 motnhs of production. That is why you will often hear about a new car getting service bulletins to add or modify a brake line clamp and a wire harness rub shield. It takes that long to get those final cars made in the plants and tested, and reviewed. Guards and clamps will be added to reduce the risk of failure due to rubbing through (hose, wire insultation or ...)

I find it interesting the "issues" taht sometimes arise with customers. For instance, My father-in-law had a trunk seal wear out on his car with only about 40K miles on it... I did a quick estimate on the number of opens/closes I would think a trunk would see in the course of 150K mile vehicle life. 2/open/close cycle on 50% of trips with an average trip around 10 miles thus about 15,000 open close cycles/150K of mileage. I then asked him about his usage. He opens an closes his trunk to put his lunch box in the trunk. this means 4 open/close per day. He only uses that car to commute to work, thus he was at about 4X my estimated usage... or another way to put it, he had 160K worth of open and closes in 40K of driving... (sometimes you get lucky with your math). After that discussion he felt better about his seal wearing out so quickly...
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 10:03
Michael Hill's Avatar
Michael Hill Michael Hill is offline
Registered User
FRC #3138 (Innovators Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,576
Michael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathannfm View Post
After building FRC robots for years it still amazes me how cars, that only cost 4 times as much can stand up to 100's of thousand of miles of driving over years and still hold up reasonably well when our robots are always barely hobbling along by the last off season.
Never underestimate the price breaks of super mass production. Also, engineers spend A LOT of time just shaving off any dollar they can. For example, in 2012, over 400000 Ford F-150s were sold. So for every dollar off their BoM cost saves $400,000, well worth spending the time on. However, in FRC, price has the habit of playing second fiddle to other things like size and weight. If we REALLY tried to, I bet we could really drive down the price of an FRC robot. It's just not a priority.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2013, 10:36
Tom Line's Avatar
Tom Line Tom Line is offline
Raptors can't turn doorknobs.
FRC #1718 (The Fighting Pi)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Armada, Michigan
Posts: 2,532
Tom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Durability in FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Hill View Post
Never underestimate the price breaks of super mass production. Also, engineers spend A LOT of time just shaving off any dollar they can. For example, in 2012, over 400000 Ford F-150s were sold. So for every dollar off their BoM cost saves $400,000, well worth spending the time on. However, in FRC, price has the habit of playing second fiddle to other things like size and weight. If we REALLY tried to, I bet we could really drive down the price of an FRC robot. It's just not a priority.
You had to go pick on my product, didn't you . Companies like Ford pay a fraction of the price that a person would for most components. When they work out a contract with a supplier, the supplier is guaranteed a certain number of parts at a certain price. As a result, they can supply at a much lower cost because they know the amount of product they will sell.

Some commodities like fasteners can be an order of magnitude less expensive for a major manufacturer.

$500 robots sound nice, don't they?

They'd also be made at a rate of a thousand or two a day....
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:01.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi