|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Championship Location Announced
I was asked why I think CMP needs to be bigger than 400 teams by several people above.
Lets look at a comparison of the last few years. 2013: 2524 Total Teams, 400 Teams at CMP, 15.8% 2012: 2339 Total Teams, 400 Teams at CMP, 17.1% 2011: 2065 Total Teams, 352 Teams at CMP, 17.0% 2010: 1808 Total Teams, 344 Teams at CMP, 19.0% 2009: 1677 Total Teams, 348 Teams at CMP, 20.7% 2008: 1501 Total Teams, 340 Teams at CMP, 22.6% 2007: 1301 Total Teams, 344 Teams at CMP, 26.4% 2006: 1133 Total Teams, 344 Teams at CMP, 30.4% 2005: 988 Total Teams, 340 Teams at CMP, 34.4% 2004: 927 Total Teams, 292 Teams at CMP, 31.4% 2003: 787 Total Teams, 291 Teams at CMP, 36.9% As you can see. Teams attending championship as a percentage of all FRC teams has been in steady decline. 2014: 54 Regionals, MICMP awards 27+, MARCMP awards 14+, PNWCMP awards 14+?, NECMP awards 14+?, at least 393 in-season merit based CMP seats, 98.3%+ of all CMP (assuming 400 seat cap) 2013: 58 Regionals, MICMP awards 27, MARCMP awards 14, 389 in-season merit based CMP seats, 97.2% of all CMP 2012: 52 Regionals, MICMP awards 18, MARCMP awards 12, 342 in-season merit based CMP seats, 85.5% of all CMP 2011: 48 Regionals, MICMP awards 18, 306 in-season merit based CMP seats, 86.9% of all CMP 2010: 43 Regionals, MICMP awards 18, 276 in-season merit based CMP seats, 80.2% of all CMP 2009: 40 Regionals, MICMP awards 18, 258 in-season merit based CMP seats, 74.1% of all CMP 2008: 41 Regionals, 246 in-season merit based CMP Seats, 72.3% of all CMP 2007: 37 Regionals, 222 in-season merit based CMP Seats, 64.5% of all CMP 2006: 33 Regionals, 198 in-season merit based CMP Seats, 57.5% of all CMP 2005: 31 Regionals, 186 in-season merit based CMP Seats, 54.7% of all CMP 2004: 26 Regionals, 156 in-season merit based CMP Seats, 53.4% of all CMP 2003: 23 Regionals, 138 in-season merit based CMP Seats, 47.4% of all CMP CMP has already reached nearly 100% saturation of merit-based teams. Additionally, this doesn't account for the other merit-based qualifiers (Sustaining, HOF, and reigning champions, reigning EI winner) At this point, you either have to start qualifying fewer teams, which is difficult to do fairly, or make CMP bigger. Last edited by Racer26 : 08-10-2013 at 11:57. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|