|
|
|
 We can't be afraid to critique the existing system. If we don't, how will it ever get better? - Jaine Perotti [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| We can't be afraid to critique the existing system. If we don't, how will it ever get better? - Jaine Perotti [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Swerve Drive CAD
The swerves my team produced this summer used two quadrature incoders from USD. Theyare not absolute, but they are very precise, and they have a built in homing tick. They work nicely, but when I put them in the CAD drawing, they almost didn't fit. That's because the swerves are compact, they only take up a 6" by 6" box.
|
|
#2
24-10-2013, 17:54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Swerve Drive CAD
We used the CUI encoders on our climbing arm this year, and didn't have any problems with them except for user error. I would have used the USD encoders, but they cost almost twice as much. Both encoders should have enough space. One is mounted on the top, and the one on the bottom is farily far away from the caster.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
