|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#181
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Quote:
Quote:
Regarding ideas on how to improve the registration process to avoid the "fastest fingers/internet" wins we currently have, how about this: What if first regional registration had a longer period for teams to apply for admission to their regional of choice (perhaps a week) and then a lottery was held for the guaranteed spaces. Then all remaining teams are in the wait-list pool (in a random order?). Notices go out to coaches indicating their acceptance or wait-list status and they can switch to open regionals or stay and take their chances. Process repeats for 2nd regional registration. Open regional registration stays the same. Would that help/be more "fair"? BTW, this was year was the easiest registration process I've ever been through! THANK YOU FIRST! See you at Inland Empire and Sacramento! - Mr. Van Coach, Robodox |
|
#182
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Some waitlists are 20+ teams deep, interesting challenges in getting more than 8 rounds for our students and robot.
Can the National Capital Region move to districts already? Wetzel |
|
#183
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
I'm starting to really see the advantage of the district system...I second your request for North Carolina - and whoever wants to play with us!
|
|
#184
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Quote:
|
|
#185
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
You can usually make a good guess based on how many teams attended an event in prior years. You do need to verify that the venue and layout will be the same, of course.
|
|
#186
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Quote:
|
|
#187
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Basically this.
|
|
#188
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Quote:
Quote:
You better double check those numbers. Yes there are some events with 20+ team wait lists, 2 to be exact. One of those is a traditional regional, New York Tech Valley, but the other is the FiM Livoniva district event. How many teams that are on the wait list does not mean how many teams will have spots at those events. Every regional has a maximum number of spots, but in some instances they will increase that number IF the location can handle the pit space for those extra teams. In rare instances there have been a few cases where 1 or 2 teams above the predetermined limit have been allowed. There are typically 10 reserved spots at traditional regionals, FiM and NE district events while MAR and PNW generally have 5 reserved spots. The main reason for those reserved spots is for rookies that register late in the season. They are first in line for those reserved spots. The next priority is for teams that do not have a confirmed spot for their first event. In the case of the district system the next priority would be teams that do not have a confirmed second event over third events. Beyond those priorities there is some discretion given to the Regional director but typically the spaces are offered in the order the remaining teams joined the list. To find the contact info for your Regional Director and Senior Mentor, if your area has one you can go here: http://www.usfirst.org/regional-contacts Note if you are in a district select the state to be able to see if there is a Senior Mentor for your area. I would recommend the Senior Mentor as your first point of contact as our focus is assisting teams and answering their questions. Last edited by Mr V : 25-10-2013 at 16:24. Reason: spelling |
|
#189
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Are you sure Tech Valley really has a 20+ team waitlist. Going into 2nd registration, it still had almost half of its spots left. I'm not surprised it was a popular 2nd choice, but that still seems kind of crazy to me.
|
|
#190
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Yes I'm sure of that, and yes you are correct that there were still a large number of spaces that were still available when second event registration opened.
|
|
#191
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Registered for SVR. Waitlisted at Davis. Darn.
|
|
#192
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Quote:
We're on the waitlist for Chesapeake - we wanted North Carolina or Palmetto since we haven't been to either, but both were totally full at 12:08 when we were able to get on for round 2. I was hoping to be able to get to see some old friends who now mentor teams attending Palmetto. Thankfully 2014 is the last year the teams around here have to deal with the race to a 2nd regional. Yet even with that good decision for next year, it's undermined by the fact that FIRST put the Philly FTC Super Regional on the SAME GD DAYS as the DC regional. If FIRST ever wanted to send a message about what teams should prioritize, that would be one. We have some tough decisions to make in the coming weeks, and other FRC events being jam-packed doesn't help at all. Last edited by JesseK : 26-10-2013 at 08:08. |
|
#193
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Quote:
*cries* *shakes fist* *emails regional directors again* |
|
#194
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Current open spots, as of 0920, 26 Oct 13.
Week 1 Alamo - 3 Week 2 Northern Lights (MN) - 8 Hub City (Lubbox, TX)- 36 Week 3 Mexico City - 19 Week 4 Buckeye (Cleveland)- 12 Week 5 Queen City - 12 Pittsburgh - 3 Week 6 Western Canada - 9 Windsor Essex Great Lakes - 16 South Florida (Ft Lauderdale) - 3 Lone Star - 23 |
|
#195
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2014
Quote:
As far as "FIRST" putting the FTC super regional on the same weekend as a FRC event I think you are blaming the wrong entity. Fact is for the most part FTC is run separately from FRC. Area FTC program managers are often not in contact with the RDs and it was planning committees made up of those FTC program managers and others involved with FTC who have organized and set the dates for the FTC super regionals FIRST headquarters had little to do with that. There are many things to consider when setting those dates and a lot of it has to do with how FTC has been run in those areas traditionally, including the dates for their qualifiers and a number of other factors. FIRST is in a transition period and going forward they are looking to unify how the different programs are implemented across the US. A good example is the fact that the FRC district system will be playing with a unified points system for this season rather than leaving many of the details of that to the individual areas to decide. Quote:
Then there is the need to find the locations for all those district events. People from WA FIRST robotics visited around 100 sites to pick the locations for the 7 district events to be held in our state. You must consider many factors in determining if a venue is suitable and you have fit within the availability of the multiple facilities. Finally there is just the logistics of the fields ect. WA FIRST Robotics has rented a large warehouse to be able to deal with the fields that we have had to purchase. A team of 6 of use spent most of Tue evening just painting the wood to construct the road cases to transport our fields. Even more people spent about 10 hours on building those cases yesterday and we don't even have a single case completely finished. We expect our team of 10 to put in another 10-12 hour day today and probably spend most of Sun before we get the basic cases built. The amount of labor and capital to get a district system is enormous. I hope that when your area goes to the district system you put your hammer where your mouth is, step up to the plate and be one of the many people who will be needed to make it happen. For example there is a group from Oregon who have traveled about 6 hours to come and make the road case build project happen. They left Oregon at O'dark:30 to be at the field house by about noon yesterday and they will probably not be home until midnight Sun. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|