|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Spotlights #2: 67 "The HOT Team"
Minor, minor nitpick: the 67 climb in 2010 Einstein Finals 2 did not count as an official climb. The 67 robot was stuck under 177, though 177 was above the platform and did receive climb points. Neither team actually grabbed the lower bar in the video. The lower bar was only on the front side of the field. In Finals 1, their post-buzzer climb did count.
Cool video! |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Team Spotlights #2: 67 "The HOT Team"
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Spotlights #2: 67 "The HOT Team"
67's hanging arm was very cool. If I remember correctly, the gas springs it relied on were mechanically released when the arm latch was deflected by the bar of the tower. Once the claw is released from the top it's all passive and requires no robot power. The claw latch was one-way, so once secured it basically couldn't let go of the tower. Possibly one of the most inspirational mechanisms I've seen in FRC, right up there with everything else 67 has ever done.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Team Spotlights #2: 67 "The HOT Team"
I couldn't have said it better myself.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Spotlights #2: 67 "The HOT Team"
Quote:
Similar to this past year, the robot did not start the season with the hanger on the robot. So, no hanger at all at Kettering. We started installing it at Detroit. It started working correctly at MSC. And was finally needed to win in Atlanta. It was not an easy system to get working. There was a ton of iteration and trial and error to get the timing and positioning right. Throughout the season everyone kept telling us to forget about getting it working and focus on just scoring a couple of more balls. Luckily we did not listen and all our hard work finally paid off in that Finals 1 match. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|