Go to Post anything is possible with dedication. - [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 15:30
Jscout11's Avatar
Jscout11 Jscout11 is offline
College Student
AKA: Jack
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 166
Jscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Keep in mind getting into MSC itself with upwards of 260 michigan teams is very hard. And almost all of the teams getting into champs by qualifying at MSC generally deserve to be there.
__________________
Member - FRC11: 2011-2014
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 15:43
Robby Unruh's Avatar
Robby Unruh Robby Unruh is offline
*insert random dial-up tone here*
FRC #3266 (Robots R Us)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Eaton, OH
Posts: 338
Robby Unruh will become famous soon enough
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jscout11 View Post
Keep in mind getting into MSC itself with upwards of 260 michigan teams is very hard. And almost all of the teams getting into champs by qualifying at MSC generally deserve to be there.
I see your point. However going in to a competition (especially a state championship) knowing that there is a 50% turnover of teams going to STL leaves a pretty sour taste in my mouth. Maybe I'll get used to it.
__________________
[Robots R Us #3266]
2015: Georgia Southern Classic (Winners / Thanks 1319 & 1648!), Queen City
2014: Crossroads, Queen City
2013: Buckeye, Queen City, Crossroads
2012: Buckeye, Queen City

2011: Buckeye
2010: Buckeye
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 15:45
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,508
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robby Unruh View Post
I see your point. However going in to a competition (especially a state championship) knowing that there is a 50% turnover of teams going to STL leaves a pretty sour taste in my mouth. Maybe I'll get used to it.
Doesn't it seem reasonable that it should be based on total district size?

It seems more unfair to me if a district sends 2x as many teams %wise.
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 15:48
Robby Unruh's Avatar
Robby Unruh Robby Unruh is offline
*insert random dial-up tone here*
FRC #3266 (Robots R Us)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Eaton, OH
Posts: 338
Robby Unruh will become famous soon enough
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Doesn't it seem reasonable that it should be based on total district size?

It seems more unfair to me if a district sends 2x as many teams %wise.
Oh no, don't worry, I understand that MI is very dense with teams. Maybe the answer lies in sending more teams to MSC.
__________________
[Robots R Us #3266]
2015: Georgia Southern Classic (Winners / Thanks 1319 & 1648!), Queen City
2014: Crossroads, Queen City
2013: Buckeye, Queen City, Crossroads
2012: Buckeye, Queen City

2011: Buckeye
2010: Buckeye
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 15:54
Gregor's Avatar
Gregor Gregor is offline
#StickToTheStratisQuo
AKA: Gregor Browning
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,447
Gregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robby Unruh View Post
Oh no, don't worry, I understand that MI is very dense with teams. Maybe the answer lies in sending more teams to MSC.
So you'd rather dilute the talent pool? Since MSC qualification is based on skill, increasing the amount of spots available only allows more less competitive teams in, which are the teams that wouldn't be qualifying for Worlds anyway.

Adding more teams to MSC stills send the same top teams, but dilutes one of the most talent rich events.
__________________
What are nationals? Sounds like a fun American party, can we Canadians come?
“For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.” -Jean Dubuffet
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -Albert Einstein
FLL 2011-2015 Glen Ames Robotics-Student, Mentor
FRC 2012-2013 Team 907-Scouting Lead, Strategy Lead, Human Player, Driver
FRC 2014-2015 Team 1310-Mechanical, Electrical, Drive Captain
FRC 2011-xxxx Volunteer
How I came to be a FIRSTer
<Since 2011
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 15:58
AGPapa's Avatar
AGPapa AGPapa is offline
Registered User
AKA: Antonio Papa
FRC #5895
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Posts: 323
AGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher149 View Post
32 slots allocated to Michigan? Heck, when you get to States, you're half-way to Champs (assuming it will stay at 64 teams at the event).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robby Unruh View Post
Hope this is addressed soon. Pretty disappointing to those on the outside looking in.
If anything, Michigan has to few slots for Championship. They currently have 275 teams signed up. With 32 slots that's 11.6% going to Championships. Compared to other regions, this percentage is low. EDIT: Three teams signed up in the twenty minutes since I posted this. 278 in Michigan now.

New England has 24 slots for 161 teams. That's 14.9%.

MAR has 18 slots for 108 teams. That's 16.7%.

Texas has 111 teams and four regionals, for 24 slots. That's 21.6%.

Ontario has 113 teams and 5 regionals, for 30 slots. That's 26.5%!

In fact, qualifying for the MI State Championship is harder than qualifying for the World Championship in Ontario. Only 23.3% of Michagan teams qualify for their State Championship. I think it's fair to say that the size of MSC could be increased without diluting the talent at the event.

These numbers could change slightly as more rookies register, but they'll still show that it's tougher to qualify for the World Championship in Michigan than elsewhere.
__________________
Team 2590 Student [2011-2014]
Team 5684 Mentor [2015]
Team 5895 Mentor [2016-]

Last edited by AGPapa : 07-11-2013 at 16:30.
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:02
dodar's Avatar
dodar dodar is offline
Registered User
FRC #1592 (Bionic Tigers)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Cocoa, Florida
Posts: 2,927
dodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond reputedodar has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Those last 2 Texas and Ontario percentages are a little misleading. They are open regionals, not districts. Teams from other areas can win those slots.
__________________
1592(Student and Mentor) 2007-2012

Blue Banners: 2008 Colorado, 2012 Orlando, 2012 South Florida, 2014 Orlando, 2015 Buckeye

Mechanical Engineering - University of Central Florida(Class of 2016)
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:11
MamaSpoldi's Avatar
MamaSpoldi MamaSpoldi is offline
Programming Mentor
AKA: Laura Spoldi
FRC #0230 (Gaelhawks)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Shelton, CT
Posts: 306
MamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant future
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter View Post
Helpful update... thanks Frank & Co!

Glad they're going with a proportional allocation... definitely the logical and fair way to go. I also like that the teams that qualified for CMP before the start of season to be in addition to the calculated proportional allocation.

It mentions in the point system document under awards that the DCMP Chairmans', EI, and RAS winners auto-qualify to CMP. It doesn't mention if DCMP Winners also get an auto-qualify to CMP. Also doesn't mention how many Chairmans', EI, and RAS winners there are... I believe at MSC last year there were 3, 1, and 1 (respectively). Does anyone know more about if this element will be "regulated" or if regions are going to have to decide for themselves?
I have the same question... sending only one Chairman's or EI winner from each district really limits the representation of the district for those awards at championship.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AGPapa View Post
If anything, Michigan has to few slots for Championship. They currently have 275 teams signed up. With 32 slots that's 11.6% going to Championships. Compared to other regions, this percentage is low.

New England has 24 slots for 161 teams. That's 14.9%.

MAR has 18 slots for 108 teams. That's 16.7%.

Texas has 111 teams and four regionals, for 24 slots. That's 21.6%.

Ontario has 113 teams and 5 regionals, for 30 slots. That's 26.5%!
Also not crazy about the fact that NE teams just lost 6 spots at CMP... this is based on a comparison to last year when we had 5 regionals in our area which have been replaced. From what is stated here, I agree that Michigan is not as fairly represented even based on percentages, but we are specifically losing spots that we had last year. Concerned that the transition period to the district system is going to be more difficult to sell. It would be easier if it was possible to make it more consistent for all teams.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodar View Post
Those last 2 Texas and Ontario percentages are a little misleading. They are open regionals, not districts. Teams from other areas can win those slots.
That's true... but those teams are also allowed to travel to any other regional as well and earn slots there, further increasing their percentage. However, this is not true for teams in the districts. If they were to go outside their district and win, they lose a spot for the district.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:12
AGPapa's Avatar
AGPapa AGPapa is offline
Registered User
AKA: Antonio Papa
FRC #5895
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Posts: 323
AGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodar View Post
Those last 2 Texas and Ontario percentages are a little misleading. They are open regionals, not districts. Teams from other areas can win those slots.
That's true, although every team that qualified from an Ontario event last year was from Ontario.

Eight non Texas teams qualified from Texas last year.

Ignoring borders, around 15.5% of all teams qualify for Championship.
__________________
Team 2590 Student [2011-2014]
Team 5684 Mentor [2015]
Team 5895 Mentor [2016-]
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:19
tr6scott's Avatar
tr6scott tr6scott is offline
Um, I smell Motor!
AKA: Scott McBride
FRC #2137 (TORC)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Oxford, MI
Posts: 522
tr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond reputetr6scott has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robby Unruh View Post
Hope this is addressed soon. Pretty disappointing to those on the outside looking in.
Yes me to, when they go to percentages in 2015, we (FiM) should get a few more...

If we look at the number of districts, and the number of spots feeding to championships..

(I assumed 40 teams per district)

FIM = 32/260 teams = 12.3%
PNW = 24/80 teams = 30%
NE = 24/180 teams = 13.3%
MAR = 38/120 teams = 15%

I have heard rumblings around Michigan of a need to add another district to support the number of rookie teams that joined this year. That will be 14 districts, about 280 teams, and a 11.4%

TORC is currently waitlisted for both our events we wanted to attend.

So yes, when you make it to MSC you are halfway there. You've eliminated the 200 teams you were capable of beating from the pool. Now all you need to do is finish the weekend better than average...

That is easier said than done.

One dose not simply walk into Championships through MSC. (but it is kind of exciting either way.)
__________________
The sooner we get behind schedule, the more time we have to catch up.

Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:34
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,138
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by tr6scott View Post

FIM = 32/260 teams = 12.3%
PNW = 24/80 teams = 30%
NE = 24/180 teams = 13.3%
MAR = 18/120 teams = 15%
I'm not sure where you're getting your numbers from, but last I checked about a week ago, the PNW district (WA and OR) had 189 teams registered for 2014, which is 12.7% for PNW.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:41
Jscout11's Avatar
Jscout11 Jscout11 is offline
College Student
AKA: Jack
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 166
Jscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond reputeJscout11 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaSpoldi View Post
Also not crazy about the fact that NE teams just lost 6 spots at CMP... this is based on a comparison to last year when we had 5 regionals in our area which have been replaced.
As Jim and Jon put it last night, the district system is not meant to get more teams to champs, but to give the vast majority of teams who don't make it to champs a greater number of matches per season, or a greater return on investment. Keep in mind that at those 5 regionals, at least a few of the spots went to teams picked in later rounds that wouldn't qualify otherwise (although there are always exceptions). In a district system, this pretty much never happens. You have to be one of the best to get to champs. The 24th team at MAR champs, for example, was on Einstein this year.
__________________
Member - FRC11: 2011-2014
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:46
BrendanB BrendanB is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brendan Browne
FRC #1058 (PVC Pirates)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 3,103
BrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaSpoldi View Post
Also not crazy about the fact that NE teams just lost 6 spots at CMP... this is based on a comparison to last year when we had 5 regionals in our area which have been replaced. From what is stated here, I agree that Michigan is not as fairly represented even based on percentages, but we are specifically losing spots that we had last year. Concerned that the transition period to the district system is going to be more difficult to sell. It would be easier if it was possible to make it more consistent for all teams.
Technically this is true and technically it is not true. I've heard a lot of people saying New England should get 30 spots because we had 30 spots previously but in looking at the 2013 season of the teams who qualified for St. Louis it breaks down as follows:

29 slots were given out to teams (GSR did not have a Rookie All star).
Of the 29 only 20 teams were from New England.
Of these 20 teams only 18 attended the World Championship.
Of the teams who came to New England events 7 of them qualified for the Championship.
Of the 20 New England winners two of them double qualified (126 BOS winners and RCA & 2648 PTR winners and EI).

The way I see it you could argue that NE should be getting 30 but if every district took what they originally had you won't fix the scalability issue. If anyone thought NE our any district would keep their original number they weren't looking at the reality of FIRST moving forward.

Also looking at NE events in the past, our events have been home to many teams from outside of our borders such as Canada, New York, out the country, and many teams who traveled to New England over the years.

Technically, New England will be sending the most teams we have ever sent to the Championship in 2014 which is something I am very excited about!
__________________
1519 Mechanical M.A.Y.H.E.M. 2008 - 2010
3467 Windham Windup 2011 - 2015
1058 PVC Pirates 2016 - xxxx
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 16:56
MamaSpoldi's Avatar
MamaSpoldi MamaSpoldi is offline
Programming Mentor
AKA: Laura Spoldi
FRC #0230 (Gaelhawks)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Shelton, CT
Posts: 306
MamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant futureMamaSpoldi has a brilliant future
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jscout11 View Post
As Jim and Jon put it last night, the district system is not meant to get more teams to champs, but to give the vast majority of teams who don't make it to champs a greater number of matches per season, or a greater return on investment. Keep in mind that at those 5 regionals, at least a few of the spots went to teams picked in later rounds that wouldn't qualify otherwise (although there are always exceptions). In a district system, this pretty much never happens. You have to be one of the best to get to champs. The 24th team at MAR champs, for example, was on Einstein this year.
I see your point... it is a paradigm shift. And for the most part I think it is a good thing. I especially think it will be a great when everyone has transitioned to districts so that we get back the ability to travel and meet teams from around the country at that level (ie. before CMP). It is just difficult to get through this intermediate phase where we still have both systems co-existing... they are each good in their way but they are not equal. As previously noted by someone in the thread about the original district point blog, the districts were built to reward different things; it is about multi-event performance rather than a single event achievement. I think this is a good goal but it will take time to adjust to that new way of thinking. And it is just a little harder with the 2 perspectives existing side-by-side and essentially competing against each other.

BrendanB - The one thing you didn't include in your analysis was the NE teams that qualified at events outside of NE regionals. I'm just curious where that number puts us. I would argue that those teams should count in your analysis because they are included in the total district spots in the current system.

I personally need to try to remember that and I will try to remind myself of that when I start thinking "it's not fair..." It's never been about fair; it is about learning and inspiring. It is about life, and everyone knows that life is not fair. At least that's what my mom always told me.
__________________

Last edited by MamaSpoldi : 07-11-2013 at 17:05. Reason: added a comment
Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2013, 17:04
Robby Unruh's Avatar
Robby Unruh Robby Unruh is offline
*insert random dial-up tone here*
FRC #3266 (Robots R Us)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Eaton, OH
Posts: 338
Robby Unruh will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaSpoldi View Post
That's true... but those teams are also allowed to travel to any other regional as well and earn slots there, further increasing their percentage. However, this is not true for teams in the districts. If they were to go outside their district and win, they lose a spot for the district.
Is this a NE-specific ruling or a new standard? Last year, 2834 won Buckeye and still competed at both MSC and Worlds.
__________________
[Robots R Us #3266]
2015: Georgia Southern Classic (Winners / Thanks 1319 & 1648!), Queen City
2014: Crossroads, Queen City
2013: Buckeye, Queen City, Crossroads
2012: Buckeye, Queen City

2011: Buckeye
2010: Buckeye
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi