|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: assembly family table
Your question is not clear. What models did you add family tables to? Maybe you want to bring this conversation over to communities.PTC.com/first?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: assembly family table
I am sorry.The program is pro engineer wf4.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: assembly family table
To be honest, the version of pro/engineer does not make a difference in this case.
Can you provide any specifics to your problem you are encountering? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: assembly family table
Dear tim tim.
Do you mean program does not permit a family table for an assembly includes created component?If so what must I do?I need this created part.Because this part must be changed according to added parts.Do you know any other way to do this?Please inform me:Best regards |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: assembly family table
Quote:
Quote:
Personally, I would recommend creating a family table for each individual part. and then making a family table for the assembly that the only change would be which parts it is using to make the assembly. For example: I would create the generic for "part 1", "part 2", and "part 3". For each of the parts I would create its own family table that composed of slight modifications to the generic part: "part 1-a", "part 1-b", "part 1-c", "part 2-a", "part 2-b", "part 2-c", "part 3-a", "part 3-b", "part 3-c". Then I would create a generic assembly, "assy A", made from the generic versions of "part 1", "part 2", and "part 3". Now create a family table that uses the children or family table created parts for each version of the assembly. So maybe "assy A-1" would be made of "part 1-a", "part 2-a", and "part 3-a"; and "assy A-2" would be made of "part 1-b", "part 2-b", and "part 3-c". Note that none of the generic versions should be used as final products or design use. The final product should parts and assemblies with dashes "-". Hopefully this makes sense to you. I am having a hard time understanding what you are trying to ask. This is my best attempt with the information you have provided. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: assembly family table
Dear tim tim I appreciate your kind helps and detailed explantion.I think I found a solution.I designed the third part, made a family table and added it to assembly and assembly family table too.Now it is working.Thanks for everything and best regards
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|