Go to Post Unfortunately I think IFI made us buy a new one. Something about 200amps across the power connector not being a warranty item. - GeorgeTheEng [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-12-2013, 13:48
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,624
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 3.6GHz 802.11y for Competitions

Quote:
Originally Posted by magnets View Post
3. If implemented properly, normal 802.11n should work fine, even with lots of other networks happening at the same time. Instead of making it more complicated to fix the problem, FIRST should resolve the current issue.
Even if FIRST reduces each field to a single channel and makes the field/robot system more stable the effect of reusing a channel will be degraded performance with one or more network.

Once the other network is out of FIRST's control the risk of channel monopolization is high.

As we have both stated putting the show stopping robot communication on a different channel is possible. That other channel should be easier to diagnose without robots of various different needs placing demands on it. The field systems are common and required for all fielded robots. TCP/IP and video is not required but nice to have.

On the topic of 3.6GHz it only perpetuates binding the necessary field communications to the extra optional traffic.
It would be far cheaper to use RS232/TTL serial to RF adapters for the field traffic.
Licensing issues may apply to both options.

Course we could try IRDA for the fields and make the fields more RF immune.

Last edited by techhelpbb : 17-12-2013 at 13:57.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi