Go to Post Comments and Documentation: Use them! You would never believe how fast you will forget how something works, especially when things are flying at you so fast. Other/future programmers will understand what you did and why you did it. - BigJ [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 21:24
cadandcookies's Avatar
cadandcookies cadandcookies is offline
Director of Programs, GOFIRST
AKA: Nick Aarestad
FTC #9205 (The Iron Maidens)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 1,563
cadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond repute
Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Recently, there was a post that really raised some questions in my mind about how people run their teams (mind you, not "they're doing it wrong" questions, but just simple curiosity).

Specifically these quotes:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JVN
"Voting is not an engineering process. We will never vote on a design."
And:

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag View Post
Voting presumes everyone gets the same say in something and that everyone is equally qualified to have a say in something. This is simply not the case. We find voting to be a popularity contest, not a logical decision making process, and therefore we don't do it. The problem is, you get kids voting for things they are not capable of carrying out.
My question is simple: in teams that do not vote on designs, how are decisions regarding designs made?
__________________

Never assume the motives of others are, to them, less noble than yours are to you. - John Perry Barlow
tumblr | twitter
'Snow Problem CAD Files: 2015 2016
MN FTC Field Manager, FTA, CSA, Emcee
FLL Maybe NXT Year (09-10) -> FRC 2220 (11-14) -> FTC 9205(14-?)/FRC 2667 (15-16)
VEXU UMN (2015-??)
Volunteer since 2011
2013 RCA Winner (North Star Regional) (2220)
2016 Connect Award Winner (North Super Regional and World Championship) (9205)
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 21:28
ksafin's Avatar
ksafin ksafin is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kirill Safin
FRC #3992 (Eagles Robotics Xperience)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 498
ksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant future
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

It's a discussion. I know that's a very vague answer but that's simply how it is.

Voting, as mentioned, isn't a "logical" decision, but can be to some extent used as such. When we decide which route we take, we weigh the opinions of more veteran members and mentors more heavily than newer members. Likewise, Mechanical, Electrical, Software, and Administrative student officers have greater weight to their say.

It's basically like a government-esque decision making process for us. Each sub-team captain pays attention to what their team thinks, to what different factions prefer, and together the sub-team captains form some kind of "cabinet" of sorts where we make final executive decisions.
__________________
FTC Teams 5257, 6568 & FRC Team 3992
Eagles Robotics Xperience
2014 FTC WORLD CHAMPIONS
14 Trophies in 3 Years
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 21:36
BJT's Avatar
BJT BJT is offline
uh, should that be smoking?
AKA: Ben Thorsgard
FRC #0876 (Thunder Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Northwood ND
Posts: 250
BJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond reputeBJT has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Early in the process we listen to ideas from everyone. The more experienced mentors and students then discuss until a consensus is formed on the basic idea. The mechanical team (myself and a few experienced students) then work out the details.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 21:57
magnets's Avatar
magnets magnets is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 748
magnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

The programming lead, and mechanical leads plus the main mentor make up the "design team", who makes all executive decisions on design. What they say is the law for robot design. It really helps clear up conflicts when half way through build season each half of the team wishes to totally redesign the robot a different way.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 22:01
BrendanB BrendanB is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brendan Browne
FRC #1058 (PVC Pirates)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 3,104
BrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Our team's design sub-team has been expanding over the years as more students and mentors gain more experience in learning more about game history, team history, and match strategy. We as a team analyze the game and come up with priority lists but the real core design team spends most of the first two weeks taking what we learn from kickoff & prototypes to develop our robot.

We have used voting system in the past but they don't always reflect the proper thought process that goes through analyzing the game, how its played, and more importantly how we should play it. Building off of the best robot concepts on the board can work to a degree, but you need a solid strategy to start with and pick the concepts that best compliment your strategy.
__________________
1519 Mechanical M.A.Y.H.E.M. 2008 - 2010
3467 Windham Windup 2011 - 2015
1058 PVC Pirates 2016 - xxxx
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 22:07
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Team Governance issues have been the source of many conflicts withing FIRST teams over the years.

In my professional life, I can't recall having been involved in voting as a means of making a significant decision. At my work we take votes from time to time but the votes are mostly about giving everyone a say and letting everyone know where everyone else stands. The purpose of the vote is not to decide but rather to help the room come to a consensus.

Consensus is how the world of engineering works for the most part. The team debates and debates and debates until everyone gets to the point where they're okay with a certain path (even if it is not the path they would have taken if it were their decision alone).

So, that is how ALMOST all decisions are made but not ALL (at least wherever I have worked). Sometimes the sides cannot come to consensus. In these cases, there is always someone empowered to make the decision. Not everyone is happy, but generally, everyone accepts the ruling because the structure of the team is understood and this is the way the team gets to move on to the next problem.

Back to FIRST. It is my experience that teams that try to come to consensus but back that up with a clearly identified "King of the Machine" (my name for this ultimate decider if consensus building failed) are more effective than any of the alternatives.

Joe J.
__________________
Joseph M. Johnson, Ph.D., P.E.
Mentor
Team #88, TJ2
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 22:16
Akash Rastogi Akash Rastogi is offline
Jim Zondag is my Spirit Animal
FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Manchester, Connecticut
Posts: 7,005
Akash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Hey Nick,

Great question and I'm glad this is something being asked before the 2014 season. I believe the best way to learn about other decision making and consensus generating techniques is to read JVN's build journal from 2010.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2360

Best of luck!

-Akash

.
__________________
My posts and opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my affiliated team.
['16-'xx]: Mentor FRC 2170 | ['11-'13]: Co-Founder/Mentor FRC 3929 | ['06-'10]: Student FRC 11 - MORT | ['08-'12]: Founder - EWCP (OG)

Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 18-12-2013 at 22:24. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 22:19
MechEng83's Avatar
MechEng83 MechEng83 is offline
Lead Mentor/Engineer
AKA: Mr. Cool
FRC #1741 (Red Alert)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 617
MechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

When I first joined our team, voting was the process to make every decision, from which regional to go to, to what architecture we went with. There were dichotomies between factions, who took it upon themselves to ignore the vote and do whatever they wanted. There was never a final authority to make decisions, which (imho) led to a diffusion of responsibility so it ended up being "everyone's fault" as well as "no one's fault" for making a disadvantageous choice.

We have since moved to a small core group of mentors and student leaders to make design decisions and have 1 student in charge of the robot, and 1 mentor who oversees the robot design/construction. About the only vote we still do is on the robot name, which can be quite a process. We're still making adjustments and tweaks to how the team operates, but for us, it's working.
__________________

2016 INWLA GP| INWCH Entrepreneurship | INPMH DCA | INCMP Team Spirit | CAGE Match Winner (w/ 1747 &868), Finalist (1471 w/ 1529 & 1018), Best Fans
2015 ININD Judges Award, Proud "Phyxed Red Card" alliance partners of 1529 & 1720 | INWLA EI | INCMP GP
2014 Boilermaker Creativity | Chesapeake Finalist, Safety, GP, Entrepreneurship | IN State Championship Winner (w/ 868 & 1018) | CAGE Match Winner (w/ 1024, 5402 & 1646)
2013 Boilermaker RCA, Innovation in Controls, Finalist | Crossroads Entrepreneurship | Newton Semi-finalist
2012 Boilermaker Entrepreneurship | Queen City EI | Curie Semi-finalist
2011 Boilermaker RCA, Entrepreneurship
Red Alert Robotics

Last edited by MechEng83 : 18-12-2013 at 22:28.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 22:23
tim-tim's Avatar
tim-tim tim-tim is offline
Simplicity by Design...
AKA: Tim Miedzinski
FRC #0836 (The RoboBees)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 605
tim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond reputetim-tim has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

There are several tools out there to help make better decisions. Some of the these tools are quick and simple, while others appear a bit more complicated but really aren't.

Some of the tools that we use, to varying degrees, are a Weighted Decision Matrix, Decision Tree, and QFD House of Quality Matrix.

The weighted decision matrix is the simplest and easiest to do, even in large groups. Another variation is to compare ideas directly against each other following the same template. For example: a group develops 3 ideas: A, B, and C with selection criterion of criteria 1, criteria 2, criteria 3, etc. To start you would define a control idea, we will choose Idea B. Then go through each of the criteria and compare Idea A to Idea B, and then Idea C to Idea B. Tally up the columns, this will tell you what ideas are better/worse than Idea B. Repeat this process by selecting Idea A or C as a control. By doing this you will know if Idea A is better/worse than Idea C.

A decision tree is very helpful at a high level and determining how to play the game. It can be used at more specific levels, but we use this as a guide to walking through the initial strategy talks and how we will play the game. It takes a decent amount of organization, but is a great way to be exposed to a lot of scenarios.

A House of Quality is probably the most technical of all the decision tools we use. It is relatively simple to use, but looks very complicated and overwhelming at a first glance. This is something I was taught my freshman year in college and have really benefited from using the tool.

There are many free and readily available templates, how to's, and examples for each of these methods on the web. I am glad to help if you need it. Really learning the design process and these tools will start to make your brain develop a "better" problem solving process.
__________________
The RoboBees

Tim's Shortcuts Anderson Powerpoles and Crimper, Star/Tube Nuts
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 23:04
Anupam Goli's Avatar
Anupam Goli Anupam Goli is offline
PCH Q&A co-founder/Scouting Mentor
AKA: noops
FRC #1648 (G3 Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,242
Anupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

In an ideal world, every design idea that comes up is put to the test and the superior design will show its superior performance, ending any debate on others that do not show similar performance during a test. That being said, not every FRC team has the resources to rigorously test ideas to the end and see which ones are best. As previously mentioned, weighted design matrix tables, mathematical and physical calculation, and proof of concepts can be used to eliminate certain designs from the pool or promote prototyping of other designs.

It's okay to prototype more than one mechanism, and as the prototypes get more and more refined, you'll start to see the differences, and it may be enough for your team to cast their decision one way or another. Voting is the absolute last resort thing you do at 11:59pm on decision day, and even then it sometimes isn't the best answer!
__________________
Team 1002: 2008-2012
Team 1648: 2012-2016
Georgia Tech Class of 2016
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 23:19
cadandcookies's Avatar
cadandcookies cadandcookies is offline
Director of Programs, GOFIRST
AKA: Nick Aarestad
FTC #9205 (The Iron Maidens)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 1,563
cadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi View Post
Hey Nick,

Great question and I'm glad this is something being asked before the 2014 season. I believe the best way to learn about other decision making and consensus generating techniques is to read JVN's build journal from 2010.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2360

Best of luck!

-Akash

.
Thank you, this was a very interesting and informative read. I think remember reading something similar from 2009.

There have been some great and informative answers so far-- I think it's interesting how teams seem to gravitate towards the "consensus" decision method.

On a personal note, this thread has vindicated a lot of the ideas I had floating around about running a decision making process.

I figure I'll also share how my team is planning to approach design this year-- I'm from a very large team (70+ students and 30+ mentors), so getting together the entire team for discussion isn't exactly a good idea (trust me, we've tried- and failed), so we're splitting into small groups that each have a "lead" student. These groups basically go through the process of selecting a strategy individually-- with emphasis on using predictive math (expected values, etc) and logical decision making (decision matrices, QFD). After they've come to individual consensus, we gather up all the leads, who do essentially the same thing, but taking input and calculations from all the individual subteams. The idea is to cast our net as wide as possible while still keeping it manageable with so many people.
__________________

Never assume the motives of others are, to them, less noble than yours are to you. - John Perry Barlow
tumblr | twitter
'Snow Problem CAD Files: 2015 2016
MN FTC Field Manager, FTA, CSA, Emcee
FLL Maybe NXT Year (09-10) -> FRC 2220 (11-14) -> FTC 9205(14-?)/FRC 2667 (15-16)
VEXU UMN (2015-??)
Volunteer since 2011
2013 RCA Winner (North Star Regional) (2220)
2016 Connect Award Winner (North Super Regional and World Championship) (9205)
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2013, 23:25
Akash Rastogi Akash Rastogi is offline
Jim Zondag is my Spirit Animal
FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Manchester, Connecticut
Posts: 7,005
Akash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadandcookies View Post
Thank you, this was a very interesting and informative read. I think remember reading something similar from 2009.

There have been some great and informative answers so far-- I think it's interesting how teams seem to gravitate towards the "consensus" decision method.

On a personal note, this thread has vindicated a lot of the ideas I had floating around about running a decision making process.

I figure I'll also share how my team is planning to approach design this year-- I'm from a very large team (70+ students and 30+ mentors), so getting together the entire team for discussion isn't exactly a good idea (trust me, we've tried- and failed), so we're splitting into small groups that each have a "lead" student. These groups basically go through the process of selecting a strategy individually-- with emphasis on using predictive math (expected values, etc) and logical decision making (decision matrices, QFD). After they've come to individual consensus, we gather up all the leads, who do essentially the same thing, but taking input and calculations from all the individual subteams. The idea is to cast our net as wide as possible while still keeping it manageable with so many people.
I'm from the school of thought that, while everyone from the team should have a chance at giving their input on concepts and what to prototype, the cold hard decision making portion ultimately falls on the core leadership group of mentors and (usually) upperclassmen subteam captains, or a Design Team. This smaller core group is the one that debates strategies, shows off prototypes, and fairly evaluates each one. On a large team, this is a lot harder.

Like you said, gathering team leads is a good idea, but sometimes you ought to let one or two others that the lead picks out from his/her group join the discussion as well.

Lots of ways to go about doing this, and a lot of it depends on your team structure. Always good to evaluate if your large team is structured in a way that might even allow the use of some of the techniques JVN discusses.
__________________
My posts and opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my affiliated team.
['16-'xx]: Mentor FRC 2170 | ['11-'13]: Co-Founder/Mentor FRC 3929 | ['06-'10]: Student FRC 11 - MORT | ['08-'12]: Founder - EWCP (OG)

Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 18-12-2013 at 23:31.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-12-2013, 00:04
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksafin View Post

It's basically like a government-esque decision making process for us. Each sub-team captain pays attention to what their team thinks, to what different factions prefer, and together the sub-team captains form some kind of "cabinet" of sorts where we make final executive decisions.
This is quite similar to the method 449 adopted last year, which worked reasonably well. We have a large group discussion in which everyone can speak their minds, and then a smaller discussion amongst team leadership where a consensus is reached.

In previous years (read: when I was a student), we had the whole team vote during downselect meetings. It was a nightmare. I hope to never do that again.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-12-2013, 01:47
seg9585's Avatar
seg9585 seg9585 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eric
FRC #4276 (Surf City Vikings)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Boeing (Seal Beach, CA)
Posts: 520
seg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond reputeseg9585 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Trade studies!!
Always use tools like the weighted design matrix (or figure of merit) to justify the designs. If there's not a clear winner out of this method, you can always add more parameters or, if you have the resources, build both systems and make it modular.
Last year my team made 2 completely different variations of a climber, and we kept it relatively modular so it can be swapped out. It turned out we used one design in the first regional, the other in the second, and tossed both out in favor of a 3rd for championship. That's how these things go, but it should never just come down to a popularity contest.
__________________
My FIRST legacy:

Team 204 Student 2001, 2002 (Voorhees, NJ)
Team 1493 College Mentor 2006 - 2008 (Troy, NY)
Team 2150 Intern/Professional Mentor 2007, 2009 (Palos Verdes)
Team 4123 Lead Engineering Mentor 2012 (Bellflower, CA)
Team 4276 Engineering Mentor 2012-2016 (Huntington Beach, CA)
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-12-2013, 02:26
TikiTech's Avatar
TikiTech TikiTech is offline
Mr. H
FRC #3880 (Tiki Techs)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Kailua-Kona, Hawaii
Posts: 252
TikiTech is just really niceTikiTech is just really niceTikiTech is just really niceTikiTech is just really niceTikiTech is just really nice
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Since the kick off is in the early morning here in Hawaii. 5am I believe, we use this as one of our team bonding experiences. It is our "camp over kick off party". A fun night of food and many rounds of our various divergent thinking games (ask us about them sometime), and hopefully some sleep in there too...

We will spend the day using the Stanford Design Thinking process to produce as many possible design ideas. This process allows everyone to share as many ideas as they can, some reasonable and some not. It is a good time for out of the box designs.

For more information on our use of Design Thinking check our website..

http://kealakeherobotics.org/student...sign-thinking/

Some of our divergent thinking games are on the website as well.

Look around but please be patient as the site is still under construction..are they ever not?


By the end of the day we all have a understanding what we need to produce as a group.


As a mentor that believes that inspiration is what FRC is loudest about, this design process really allows the students to "own" the design as a team. This ownership creates a drive and passion that is easy to see in every one of our members.


Aloha!



One of our coaches and now a recently graduated member are Stanford D School instructors and travel the state doing workshops.
Let me know if you are interested in more information, we love to share..
__________________
Team 3880 - "Tiki Techs" "Mr. H" - Tiki Technologies Coach / Mentor
Kealakehe High School Robotics - Kailua-Kona, Hawaii
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
2016 Hopper Division | Orlando Regional Engineering Inspiration Award | Hawaii Regional Chairman's Award & Finalist & Woodie Flowers Finalist
2015 Carson Division | Silicon Valley Regional Engineering Inspiration Award | HI Regional Regional Winners & Engineering Inspiration & Deans List Finalist
2014 Newton Division | Hawaii Regional Engineering Inspiration Award & Deans List Finalist
2013 Newton Division | Inland Empire Regional Regional Chairman's & Creativity Award | Los Angles Regional Engineering Inspiration Award | | HI Regional
2012 Curie Division | Hawaii Regional Engineering Inspiration Award
2011 Newton Division | Hawaii Regional Regional Winners & Industrial Design Award
.
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi