|
|
|
 I wanted my team to be rewarded for something they do, not because they do it for the award. - MikePres [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I wanted my team to be rewarded for something they do, not because they do it for the award. - MikePres [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
10-02-2003, 14:04
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
My understanding of the changes in PBASIC is that the new syntax is actually handled by the Editor(or more specifically, the tokenizer), so any Stamp supported by the v2.0 editor should be able to take PBASIC 2.5 code...
|
|
#3
10-02-2003, 14:19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Nate: my assumption from what you just said is:
pbasic 2.5 syntax uploaded to the 2002 competition Robot Controller should work? I shall try. --yang where's rbayer when you need him?  Last edited by yangotang : 10-02-2003 at 17:45. |
|
#4
10-02-2003, 22:11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
I'm here. I've just been working on my robot all day. Anyways, you can use the 2.5 syntax with any Stamp chip. The key is that everything eventually gets tokenized down to machine code which is the same regardless of what PBASIC version you use.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| PBasic 2.5 vs. 2.0 | Anthony Kesich | Programming | 6 | 09-02-2003 22:06 |
| 2002 California Robot Games | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 11 | 28-09-2002 22:05 |
| California Robot Game 2002 | Ken Leung | Western Region Robotics Forum | 0 | 09-09-2002 20:16 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
Linear Mode
