|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Shafts in Drivetrains
In our experience it's is the robot weight supported by the shaft that has more impact. Also the distance between the wheel and the bear shaft is supported on. Our team has successfully bent 1/2" keyed Aluminum shaft. For cantilever shaft steel is the probably the best choice.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Shafts in Drivetrains
We've bent 6061 and 2024 1/2" round shafts. Never a problem with 7075 1/2" round for wheel axles. Just don't cantilever it out too far. In 2012, we had 6" pneumatic tires and 7075 axles, and we jumped the robot over the center field bump (and speed bumps at school) to where the whole thing was a clear 8" in the air, and it was never a problem. Also, I would sometimes ride the robot, and I weigh twice as much as it does.
Last edited by sanddrag : 24-12-2013 at 13:42. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Shafts in Drivetrains
im planning on a 3/8'' dead shaft, for a 6x6 or 8x8 DT.
is that a problem in your opinion? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Shafts in Drivetrains
Quote:
3/8" Round has a section modulus of 85mm^3 1/2" Round has a section modulus of 202mm^3 and 1/2" Hex has a section modulus of 213mm^3 We have bent 1/2" steel round in a non-drivetrain robotics application, and we have bent 1/2" bolts used as dead axles supported on both sides of the wheel (estimate 5" spacing)...this comparison would make me very hesitant to use 3/8" Sources: http://67.237.145.72/PDFs/SECTIONPROPERTIES.pdf http://www.engineersedge.com/calcula...re_case_15.htm Last edited by Qbot2640 : 24-12-2013 at 15:17. Reason: Added sources |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|