Self pass over the truss

[Micro_Brooke]

You wouldn't even have time to throw it up and make it to the other side to catch it.

[EricH]

Originally Posted by Micro_Brooke

You wouldn't even have time to throw it up and make it to the other side to catch it.

There are going to be some pretty fast robots out there. I'm pretty certain some of them could do it pretty handily, particularly if they shoot on the move.

[MasterEric]

Originally Posted by Micro_Brooke

You wouldn't even have time to throw it up and make it to the other side to catch it.

What makes you say this?
The truss is only 1 foot wide, so if you stood almost below it and threw it in a shape like a steep parabola, you would only have to move a foot or two to catch it.

[Rypsnort]

if you take the size of the robots into consideration you may not even have to move at all because the bot could be long enough to just sit under the truss.

[AndyBare]

Originally Posted by MasterEric

What makes you say this?
The truss is only 1 foot wide, so if you stood almost below it and threw it in a shape like a steep parabola, you would only have to move a foot or two to catch it.

Well you'd probably have to move closer to 5. 2 feet for ball, 1 for truss, then another 2 for the ball as it falls on the other side.

[Kevin Sevcik]

Originally Posted by Micro_Brooke

You wouldn't even have time to throw it up and make it to the other side to catch it.

If you're holding a ball, it has the same velocity as your robot. Drive forward at a steady speed, shoot it straight up, and it'll land right back on your robot. Granted that's a different launching system than you'd need for Top Goal, but it's perfectly doable.

[dubiousSwain]

Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik

If you're holding a ball, it has the same velocity as your robot. Drive forward at a steady speed, shoot it straight up, and it'll land right back on your robot. Granted that's a different launching system than you'd need for Top Goal, but it's perfectly doable.

the ball is pretty large, the air drag would throw it off. in a perfect vacuum, yes, that would work, but not in the game

[PAR_WIG1350]

Originally Posted by dubiousSwain

the ball is pretty large, the air drag would throw it off. in a perfect vacuum, yes, that would work, but not in the game

Then you compensate by throwing it forward slightly.

[wireties]

Originally Posted by dubiousSwain

the ball is pretty large, the air drag would throw it off. in a perfect vacuum, yes, that would work, but not in the game

the ball is heavy enough and the flight duration short enough that Kevin's approximation is a valid one (as in less significant than other mechanical errors throwing and catching)