|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Not So-Secret Secret End-Game
As I see it, here are the arguments for and against. I hope I'm doing everyone's statements justice.
Arguments for a secret end game: -Woodie's statement in the video that they would change things up -The lack of changes in the game as presented (rather the opposite; recycled and repackaged strategies and game pieces) -An over-built volleyball net -An expensive light toy to hold the next ball -Both the light and (especially) the truss featured prominently in the video as teasers, and in the manual -A useless but highly described "defense" strategy that no team will choose to focus on, but might be an excuse for a hanging appendage -The disruptive presence of Ri3D projects, potentially leading to vanilla robots -No end game currently -Shorter game play Arguments against a secret end game: -Perhaps hidden depths to game play strategy that, without deeper understanding and practice, are not yet discernible to most teams -The possibility that the truss was donated, borrowed, rented, or already part of FIRST's stock and therefore an easy choice for a field element -The possibility that FIRST made last-minute changes to the game, or put in place a backup game -The furor that a major gameplay change would cause among many (most) teams, especially veterans and teams with a quick design/manufacturing process -The fact that FRC is, after all, made up of humans. They can't always hit a home run; in fact, they might just have made a less-than-exciting game (at least on the surface; see above) I am inclined toward there being a hidden game. I think it will be revealed soon after Ri3D is complete; certainly no later than next Saturday. I would not be surprised if "assist" were to extend toward helping other teams with a multi-robot hang, perhaps off of a yet-to-be-revealed attachment to the truss. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|