|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Not So-Secret Secret End-Game
It just seems incredibly strange that half the game name is a complete lie
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Not So-Secret Secret End-Game
Quote:
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Not So-Secret Secret End-Game
At first I was thinking this was just a conspiracy theory cooked up by those veterans who were disappointed that the game was forcing them to collaborate with other teams.
However.... the more I read the other comments, the more I'm open to the possibility that FRC could change things up mid-build season. The one factor that gives me pause is the proliferation of the Ri3Ds this year. If FIRST is looking to force more innovative approaches, introducing an end-game mid-way would be a way to do that. One other point that hasn't been mentioned yet is that changing requirements mid-stream is extremely common in the real-world. It is pretty much how most of the software projects I've worked on pan out. It is very good skill to learn how to adapt and improvise. Frustrating -- you bet. But it can also be extremely rewarding when the team pulls it together at the last minute. ant |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Not So-Secret Secret End-Game
You could say a lot of the names are lies though... I mean rebound rumble didn't really have a lot of rebounding or surprise earthquakes. And breakaway means nothing ( to my knowledge ) so I think the same is just catchy.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Not So-Secret Secret End-Game
Quote:
There is no sport to pull aerial from and doesn't really seem to be a major part of the game. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|