|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
The bladders are actually supposed to be 25 inches in diameter. That could explain why they tend to be on the large side. http://www.sportogo.com/2565cmbladder.aspx
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
gotta think that inflation pressure is going to have some effect here, too.
how uniform will *that* be at comps? |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
At comp, they might do the same as what they did in 2011 and have an inflation box that they use that is roughly the volume the ball is supposed to be.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azc8AKzgEwE |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
Quote:
No matter what the regulation is we better count on someone who does not appreciate the implications of their seemingly trivial volunteer job at an event. Balls could be very over-inflated, under-inflated, or both. Plan accordingly. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
We followed this inflation guide:
http://www.usfirst.org/sites/default...ance_Guide.pdf We measured the circumference. Independent measurements were made by three students. The average diameter of eight measurements was 24.7 inches. We got burned by larger tournament tubes than we had designed and practiced with in 2011 so we'll make sure that we take ball diameter variance into account this year. |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
Essentially, "Inflate the balls until they are properly inflated."
|
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
It's not quite as tautological as you make it sound. Using the zipper as a tightness gauge makes the subjective interpretation of "properly inflated" a narrower range of possibilities than it might otherwise be.
|
|
#26
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
I thought it was fine. It says to design for several inches of variability.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
I would assume that ball size variability would affect ball intake designs the most.
Take it out of the equation. ![]() |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
Did I just see your username correctly? DaisyPoof? Team 254? haha...
|
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
DaisyPoof sounds like what EJ would name the robot if the rest of the team would let him.
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ball dimensional variability
Who started the Decepticon thing then?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|