Go to Post Build season can't come soon enough. - Ryan Dognaux [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Pneumatics
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2014, 10:34
ebarker's Avatar
ebarker ebarker is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ed Barker
FRC #1311 (Kell Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Kennesaw GA
Posts: 1,437
ebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

This is slightly off topic from the OP but I have some questions;

1) in the past there was a max CV rating on pneumatic solenoids. The only limitation is 1/8 NPT.

2) in the past there was a max volume of stored air.

I see no limitations on those items this year. Is that everyone's interpretation ?

Many years ago the KOP had a simple Festo pneumatic valve that you connected to each end of the cylinder, and to the supply. There was ONE electric solenoid that operated the valve. We prefer to use that type of valve.

I'm interested in these valves from Automation Direct.

There are the double and single solenoid types, very economical. Can someone explain the advantage of double versus single solenoid.

Thanks, Ed
__________________
Ed Barker
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2014, 10:38
jijiglobe's Avatar
jijiglobe jijiglobe is offline
Registered User
FRC #0694
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 132
jijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant futurejijiglobe has a brilliant future
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

To shave pounds off of a pneumatic system you can use an offboard compressor and plastic air tanks. Then the only noticable weight comes from your pistons which is not something you can work around. Keep in mind that an offboard compressor needs to be controlled by the robot because of some odd rules.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2014, 11:38
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,770
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

Ed,
The volume limitation was by number of storage devices and that limitation was removed long ago. The Cv specification was removed as redundant this year since the 0.160 id tubing and associated fittings limit the volume and some manufacturers are no longer printing Cv specifications.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2014, 13:33
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is offline
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,923
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

Hi Ed:
Aside from being a supporter of First AutomationDirect is a next day delivery for you & they have good stock.
The AutomationDirect valves are legal this year (Cv.78) The nominal pressure rating is 20-115 PSI. The way I read the rules means a separate relief valve unless you have something that says otherwise.

Quote:
R77-D. Solenoid valves that are rated for a maximum working pressure that is less than 125 psi rating mandated above are permitted, however if employed, an additional pressure relief valve must be added to the low pressure side of the main regulator. The additional relief valve must be set to a lower pressure than the maximum pressure rating for the solenoid valve,
One reason to use a double solenoid valve is for spring center. The center position can either block or connect the A & B ports. So the cylinder will stop or flop when the solenoids are not powered. Another reason would if you want the valve to stay in the position last set rather than a spring return to the "off" position.

Last edited by FrankJ : 13-01-2014 at 13:40.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2014, 14:59
Mike Schreiber's Avatar
Mike Schreiber Mike Schreiber is offline
Registered User
FRC #0067 (The HOT Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 479
Mike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankJ View Post
Hi Ed:
Aside from being a supporter of First AutomationDirect is a next day delivery for you & they have good stock.
The AutomationDirect valves are legal this year (Cv.78) The nominal pressure rating is 20-115 PSI. The way I read the rules means a separate relief valve unless you have something that says otherwise.
Al,

My question isn't whether these valves are legal, it is whether I need to add the extra relief valve because the maximum working pressure is below 125 psi (R77D). The same question goes to these AutomationDirect valves. It doesn't make sense to me to add it because they will never operate above 60psi, but according to my interpretation of the rules I need it. I understand the difference between failure pressure and operating pressure, but which does "working" refer to? Are the SMC valves only okay because IFI has said they'll operate up to that pressure, and what about the varieties of SMC valves VexPro doesn't sell?
__________________
Mike Schreiber

Kettering University ('09-'13) University of Michigan ('14-'18?)
FLL ('01-'02), FRC Team 27 ('06-'09), Team 397 ('10), Team 3450/314 ('11), Team 67 ('14-'??)
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2014, 20:52
nuttle nuttle is offline
Registered User
AKA: Allen Nuttle
FRC #4080
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 104
nuttle has much to be proud ofnuttle has much to be proud ofnuttle has much to be proud ofnuttle has much to be proud ofnuttle has much to be proud ofnuttle has much to be proud ofnuttle has much to be proud ofnuttle has much to be proud of
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

Norgren 16-004-003 is a little lighter than the usual 16-004-011, but also allows you to omit a brass fitting (if you're using the new compressor). Likely not worth worrying over though. You can also get smaller pressure gauges that should be a little lighter, if you're really trying to save a little weight/space. I also like Clippard TV-2SP for the dump valve but I'm not sure if it saves any weight as I don't have one handy...
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2014, 07:45
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,770
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

Mike,
The specs are a little confusing. The way I read the sheet you linked, the pressure rating is recommended operating pressure. The sheet gives a range of 0.15 to 0.7 MPa but it does not specify a max operating pressure.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2014, 13:40
Mark McLeod's Avatar
Mark McLeod Mark McLeod is offline
Just Itinerant
AKA: Hey dad...Father...MARK
FRC #0358 (Robotic Eagles)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,800
Mark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Creating the Lightest Pneumatic System

Quote:
Originally Posted by ebarker View Post
There are the double and single solenoid types, very economical. Can someone explain the advantage of double versus single solenoid.
They both perform the same actions as far as extending/retracting a cylinder.
The difference is that a single solenoid has a home position that it always returns to when the robot is Disabled, while the double solenoid always remains in the last position it was set to.

A single solenoid is preferred when you have a mechanism that must always be stowed in a home position, or a mechanism that you want to activate at the very end of a match no matter what. It can be a little less safe, because the mechanism will activate whenever the robot is Disabled.
An example from last season might be a low bar hanger that would retract automatically when the match ended giving you 10 pts as long as the robot was in position.

A double solenoid is a good choice when you want a mechanism to remain in the last position you chose. Especially when there is no particular home position, like a gripper. It's a little safer because the mechanism doesn't suddenly move whenever the robot is disabled.
__________________
"Rationality is our distinguishing characteristic - it's what sets us apart from the beasts." - Aristotle
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi