|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
This year, we will be using a fair amount of pneumatics. With multiple storage tanks the fill time using the viaair compressor is problematic.
What unique and legal method of filling high-volume pneumatic storage have you come up with? I'm currently considering some type of tank 'storage' farm made of cots components that can be filled during our down periods with the robot compressor. We can use the stored air to fill the robot during the quick turn around matches of the playoffs. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Quote:
An option if your storage exceeds the duty cycle would be to pre-charge up to the duty cycle, pause and then continue pre-charging. This assumes you have enough time in between matches. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
You can use the attached formulas to calculate the stored energy in your tank farm, and thus evaluate the risks involved with your design. These formulas assume that the stored pressurized gas expands isentropically and instantaneously to atmosphere.
For example, say you have a 1 cubic foot container of air pressurized to 120 psig. If a catastrophic failure occurred to the container, the rapid expansion of the pressurized air could release 31 kJ to the atmosphere. There could be physiological effects (eardrum rupture, low-velocity impact from shrapnel) within a 7.5 ft radius around the container. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Quote:
![]() Look at the pneumatics section of the rule book. Between R78, R85 and R86 I personally don't see how having off-board storage to help charge your on-board tanks is legal. If you are seriously considering this route, please ask on the Q&A so your inspectors have some guidance from the GDC before you show up at the competition! Also, please note that the rules (R79) specify that all compressed air comes from "one and only one" compressor, with the provided specs for the compressor. Do NOT bring a second robot compressor with the intent of using one to pre-charge and a different one for use during the match. Do NOT bring a normal shop compressor at all. The current those things pull is generally not supported in the pits, and you will most likely be asked to remove it from the venue. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Be careful with using off board storage. We did this in 2012 and used a 1 gallon storage tank filled painfully slow from the robots compressor. We then used the remote tank to top off our robot for eliminations or when we had a long wait in the que. We had a few teams complain and the LRI at the Michigan state championships told us it was against the rules and we had to abandon it.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
This brings up another question. What is the duty cycle for the Viair compressor? Is it published somewhere? After running for several minutes it gets very hot. We have run ours during prototype testing at >50% duty cycle for up to ten minutes at a time with no issues.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
The duty cycle of the Viair compressor is printed on the label of the compressor: 9% at 100psi. AndyMark also has it listed on their website. http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-2005.htm
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Quote:
http://www.viaircorp.com/images/manu..._95_Manual.pdf What they are not specific about though is the max run time of the compressor before you have to shut it off to let it cool. They give some examples that show you can run it for over 5 minutes before shutting it off. There is also a thermal overload that is supposed to shut it off when it overheats. I don't believe we have ever got to that point. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Oh look, its the yearly thread about how silly the pneumatics rules are when it comes to pre-charging your tanks.
My stance is unchanged. 1) You are allowed to pre-fill your tanks, regardless of whether or not your robot has the compressor on board. 2) You are allowed to change your battery AFTER you pre-charge the tanks and BEFORE the start of a MATCH. 3) If you have the compressor off-board, for some inexplicable reason, you have to power and control it via the cRIO, rather than some other system that safely shuts off at 120psi and would otherwise meet pneumatics rules (particularly in terms of safety features). #3 is the one I don't understand. Since #1 and #2 are true, it literally makes no difference to a match HOW the air got in the tanks. There are dozens of ways I can think of to safely control my compressor that don't involve me needing some way of attaching it to the cRIO (and ostensibly, through a Spike and DSC and PDB) Relevant 2014 rules here: http://frc-manual.usfirst.org/Search_Results/off-board |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Quote:
For example, most (maybe all?) pit power supplies are limited - if you bring in a shop compressor and power it on while your neighbors are charging batteries, laptops, and running their bandsaw you'll probably blow the breaker and cut power to multiple pits (individual setups vary, but probably 4+ pits). That's why most inspectors will ask teams to remove any shop compressors from the building - we want to ensure you don't ruin other team's days by cutting power to their pits. Additionally, when it comes to something as potentially dangerous as pneumatics (an exploding tank can be very dangerous!), FIRST has to take the safe path. We can't assume that every inspector will recognize a safe pneumatics set up, or that every team will be able to create a safe set up from scratch. Thus the strict rules - if FIRST provides explicit instructions on how EVERYONE has to set up their system, then it's much more likely that everyone will be safe, both at the events and in their shops. It's the same reason FIRST has strict rules on how to connect your battery to the robot... there are many ways you could do that, but only 1 method that you're allowed to use. Safety FIRST! |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
IMHO, the requirement to control the compressor via the cRio at all (on or off-board) is meaningless.
You can start the match with 120psi of air in the tanks. You can change the battery after you charge the tanks. You don't even have to have the compressor on your robot. And there isn't even a requirement for a specific pressure switch or compressor. There is no competitive advantage to running the compressor when the robot is not enabled, as long as the valves cannot be actuated (which is true now). A simple pressure switch and relay would suffice, but instead we need to use a control system programmed by the teams (which IMHO is less safe than a simple relay), which has a significant boot time and requires a laptop just to fill up the robot in the queue line. I also don't see how preventing a shop type compressor from being used to fill the robot is any less safe than a team using the same compressor for an air riveter in their pit. The compressor is running, the commercially made tank is full of air, and the pits are fine. In the same way, we currently use a 50a rated battery connector which has proven itself unfit for the hundreds of amps a modern FRC robot is capable of drawing. It will (and has, in several cases) melted before the main breaker trips. The manufacturer even makes larger connectors which are perfect for us, but we can't legally use them. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Quote:
The compressor fills both the storage farm and the robot. Close both ball valves, pull the pneumatic tube, and keep the storage farm for the play-offs. Would that violate a rule? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Quote:
This is, at it's core, a safety issue. The compressor must be controlled by the Crio so it can be disabled by the FMS, just like every other robot mechanism. A simple commercial solution may well work to put air in the tanks to the right pressure, but it would not be something that could be remotely disabled through the FMS or if the control system loses comms or whatever. The programing related to safe operation of the compressor is verified by a specific set of tests conducted during inspection (pressure switch set point, vent plug setpoint and compressor shutdown on robot disable). If a robot fails any of these, the programming is fixed till it can pass. Shop compressors in the pits have been unwelcomed for a long time. They're loud, trip breakers and encourage the use of tools that probably shouldn't be used in a pit. Yes, there are valid uses for one and I'm sure teams will continue to bring them and some venues will be inclined to allow them. That doesn't make it a great idea, though, and teams that want to use one should be prepared to be told to put it away. I'm really apprehensive about using them to pre-charge storage tanks on the robot. Again, it's a safety thing. The safe operation of the robots pneumatics is verified by the inspectors, whereas it would be impossible for inspectors to verify the safety of every robot/shop compressor combination, and the implications of failed pneumatics storage are incredibly serious. I agree that the current Anderson connector is probably underrated for our needs. While the manufacturers rating and it's application specific rating aren't necessarily the same, and the majority of melted connectors are probably due to poor maintenance and other issues, a larger capacity connector would be reasonable. But rules is rules. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems
Very true, but the crio can still disable the compressor if the tether falls out, the disable button is hit, a watchdog barks or whatever. Enabling the crio requires the users effort and consent and fails to a relatively safe mode; a relay/pressure switch just requires power.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|