Go to Post Although I have much yet to go, in my short time in FIRST I have learned there is no such thing as a waste of time, especially when a) fundraising, b) mentoring students, or c) reading directions. - Amanda Morrison [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Pneumatics
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 13:17
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Why do you care if you can disable the compressor via the cRio?

The danger is not the compressor, it's the air in the tanks. Control via the cRio does not change that.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 13:19
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

All the inspectors are doing in their checks is testing that a) the 125psi relief valve is functioning properly, b) that the nason switch is shutting off the compressor (under control of the cRIO) at 115-120psi, c) that the working components are all downstream of a 60psi reg.

I'm not suggesting that any of these tests be abandoned. Just changed such that as long as I prove the reliefs are working and the compressor shuts off when it should (below 120), it doesn't matter what controls I used to achieve it.
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 13:24
Peter Matteson's Avatar
Peter Matteson Peter Matteson is offline
Ambitious but rubbish!
FRC #0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,653
Peter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy A. View Post
This is, at it's core, a safety issue. The compressor must be controlled by the Crio so it can be disabled by the FMS, just like every other robot mechanism. A simple commercial solution may well work to put air in the tanks to the right pressure, but it would not be something that could be remotely disabled through the FMS or if the control system loses comms or whatever.
Right idea but a little off in the reasoning.

This is as simple as the inspectors and safety personnel needing to be ensured of safety by the teams.

I as an educated engineer can make several simple systems that will work for off board pnuematics charging, however it becomes incumbent on me to prove this is safe to the event staff. If everyone has a different system how do I as an inspector or safety personnel at the event know that your system is properly designed and tested? How do I know if you're not using my pressure transducer that you aren't overpressuring your system?

It is easier for FIRST to legislate the design of the system so that they know it is safe because the design is tested and proven.

Also when you consider off board compressors please think about this, Do you want to be sweatting a slow leak in the system when you're queued on the field through opening ceremonies or a long Dean speach? You may regret this decision...
__________________
2011 Championship Finalists/Archimedes Division Championships w/ 2016 & 781
2010 Championship Winners/Newton Division Champions
Thank-you 294 & 67

2009 Newton Division Champions w/ 1507 & 121
2008 Archimedes Division Champions w/ 1124 & 1024
2007 Championship Winners/Newton Division Champions w/190, 987 & 177 The Wall of Maroon
2006 Galileo Division Champions w/ 1126 & 201
www.bobcatrobotics.org
"If you can't do it with brains, it won't be done with hours." - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 13:37
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Everyone,
The basis of all this discussion comes down to one very simple rule...
R34
Non-electrical sources of energy used by the ROBOT, (i.e., stored at the start of a MATCH), shall come only from the following sources:
A. compressed air stored in the pneumatic system that is legal per R79 and R80,
B. a change in the altitude of the ROBOT center of gravity, and
C. storage achieved by deformation of ROBOT parts.

Referenced in the preamble...
"In addition, another intent of these rules is to have all energy sources and active actuation systems on the ROBOT (e.g. batteries, compressors, motors, servos, cylinders, and their controllers) drawn from a well-defined set of options. This is to ensure that all Teams have access to the same actuation resources,and to ensure that the Inspectors are able to accurately assess the legality of a given part."

Every team believes and expects that the inspectors are insuring that this rule is met. To assist us with that task the remaining pneumatic rules are in place.
If you think that teams would never bypass the rules or do something unsafe (intentional or unintentional), I suggest you spend a weekend as an inspector. Every bad scenario that you can think of, we have seen. Including the team who had a student holding the power cord for the shop compressor and would pull the power when he thought the system was sufficiently charged.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.

Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 23-01-2014 at 13:41.
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 13:48
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Mentor, LRI, MN RPC
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,827
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
Consider a system where you have 15 Cots storage tanks attached to a portion of your robot cart. These storage tanks have the mandatory emergency release ball valve and pressure gage on them. While in the pits, you run a piece of pneumatic tubing from the pressure release ball valve on your robot to the pressure release ball valve on your storage farm. Open both ball valves, and turn on the compressor.

The compressor fills both the storage farm and the robot.

Close both ball valves, pull the pneumatic tube, and keep the storage farm for the play-offs.

Would that violate a rule?
When you're hooked up this way, is there any easy way to release stored air? It sounds like your manual vent plug isn't accessibly as it's connected to your off-board storage. I also read the rules as implying that off-board storage isn't allowed - the diagrams for off-board compressors explicitly show what is allowed off-board in those situations, and storage is not included off-board. Why would storage be allowed off-board for an on-board compressor, but not be allowed off-board for an off-board compressor?
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 14:53
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Al,

Is there any official way to suggest a rule change for the future? The rule is not ambiguous at all now, so it dosn't seem like the Q and A is the right place, but neither is CD.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 14:55
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Everyone,
The basis of all this discussion comes down to one very simple rule...
R34
Non-electrical sources of energy used by the ROBOT, (i.e., stored at the start of a MATCH), shall come only from the following sources:
A. compressed air stored in the pneumatic system that is legal per R79 and R80,
B. a change in the altitude of the ROBOT center of gravity, and
C. storage achieved by deformation of ROBOT parts.

Referenced in the preamble...
"In addition, another intent of these rules is to have all energy sources and active actuation systems on the ROBOT (e.g. batteries, compressors, motors, servos, cylinders, and their controllers) drawn from a well-defined set of options. This is to ensure that all Teams have access to the same actuation resources,and to ensure that the Inspectors are able to accurately assess the legality of a given part."

Every team believes and expects that the inspectors are insuring that this rule is met. To assist us with that task the remaining pneumatic rules are in place.
If you think that teams would never bypass the rules or do something unsafe (intentional or unintentional), I suggest you spend a weekend as an inspector. Every bad scenario that you can think of, we have seen. Including the team who had a student holding the power cord for the shop compressor and would pull the power when he thought the system was sufficiently charged.
Al,

I know you and I have hashed this out in the past.

R79 states I must use one and only one compressor, with flow rate not exceeding 1.05cfm. While I would argue that since I can change my battery after precharging and before a MATCH, the compressor used to pre-charge my tanks is irrelevant in terms of competitive advantage, I could see an argument that using some high-flow compressor gives me an unfair advantage because I don't need to wait around while my compressor charges, even in the pits. I don't really take issue with R79. So I have to use a Viair C90 or old KOP Thomas compressor, or something very similar, no big deal.

R80 is the one that I am taking issue with. I disagree that its restriction that I must use my ROBOT's control system to control my compressor has any competitive or safety based reason for existence -- provided that I'm still proving that the reliefs and system-full shutoff are working properly. If the safeties are the same, this restriction is completely arbitrary and unnecessarily stifles creativity. Competitively, its the 120psi air that gives me a competitive advantage. Its source, and how its source is controlled are irrelevant. Safety wise, I'm recommending the checks be kept, so its still safe.
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 14:59
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Andrew,
While people may not post, that does not mean they are not reading and lurking here on a regular basis. I would bet that the GDC and HQ have read your posts and understand your feelings. Posting the question on the Q&A will give you a definitive answer from GDC.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 22:27
kramarczyk's Avatar
kramarczyk kramarczyk is offline
is getting his kicks.
AKA: Mark Kramarczyk
FRC #3096 (Highlanders)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 602
kramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
I'm currently considering some type of tank 'storage' farm made of cots components that can be filled during our down periods with the robot compressor. We can use the stored air to fill the robot during the quick turn around matches of the playoffs.
Tom,
Since it looks like you are going the Centerline for week 1 where I will be the LRI I would like to tell you that I see no provisions in the rules for off board storage of air, just provisions for an off board compressor. Additionally, the illustrations with R85 & R86 explicitly show the air storage on board the robot. Unless there is a rule update, relevant Q&A or specific instructions from the Chief FRC Inspector, I do not see off board air storage as legal. It can absolutely be done safely, but I don't think it is legal at this time. Feel free to make a counter argument.

MK
__________________
Mark

Brick walls are for other people. - Randy Pausch
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2014, 22:36
Gregor's Avatar
Gregor Gregor is offline
#StickToTheStratisQuo
AKA: Gregor Browning
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,447
Gregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond reputeGregor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by kramarczyk View Post
Tom,
Since it looks like you are going the Centerline for week 1 where I will be the LRI I would like to tell you that I see no provisions in the rules for off board storage of air, just provisions for an off board compressor. Additionally, the illustrations with R85 & R86 explicitly show the air storage on board the robot. Unless there is a rule update, relevant Q&A or specific instructions from the Chief FRC Inspector, I do not see off board air storage as legal. It can absolutely be done safely, but I don't think it is legal at this time. Feel free to make a counter argument.

MK
I also don't see any rules or Q&A that explicitly disallow this setup either. It's a grey area and definitely warrants a Q&A.
__________________
What are nationals? Sounds like a fun American party, can we Canadians come?
“For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.” -Jean Dubuffet
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -Albert Einstein
FLL 2011-2015 Glen Ames Robotics-Student, Mentor
FRC 2012-2013 Team 907-Scouting Lead, Strategy Lead, Human Player, Driver
FRC 2014-2015 Team 1310-Mechanical, Electrical, Drive Captain
FRC 2011-xxxx Volunteer
How I came to be a FIRSTer
<Since 2011
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2014, 06:56
kramarczyk's Avatar
kramarczyk kramarczyk is offline
is getting his kicks.
AKA: Mark Kramarczyk
FRC #3096 (Highlanders)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 602
kramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregor View Post
I also don't see any rules or Q&A that explicitly disallow this setup either. It's a grey area and definitely warrants a Q&A.
I understand that as written, this is a grey area within the rule. The grey area was removed at LRI training this year (and is consistent with prior years). Conveniently, the same guidance that was provided at training was captured in the recent FRC Ask an Expert webcast on Robot Inspection located at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jW_X...e_gdata_player
It is a lengthy video. The portion relevant to this conversation is at 35:10. I realize that this is not an actual rule, but I think it is only fair for the teams to know what guidance was given to all the LRI's. For this that are not aware, this training takes place at FIRST HQ with members of the GDC in the room. Consequentially, there isn't much room for me to have an opinion on this issue.

Fortunately it is only halfway through the build season and there is plenty of time to get a Q&A submitted.

MK
__________________
Mark

Brick walls are for other people. - Randy Pausch
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2014, 08:07
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Filling Robot Pneumatic Systems

Spoiler Alert! History lesson coming....
When FRC first allowed compressed air to be used on robots, (no it was not always the case) the rules were written for very specific implementations. On board compressor and a maximum number of metal storage tanks only. Then one day Bill Beatty of the World Famous Hammond Team asked if they could take the compressor off the robot to add weight for another device. The GDC at the time decided to agree with Mr. Bill. These were the provisions, moving the compressor off board could buy the team nothing but the weight savings in return for the risky choice to have no additional air for the match. That is the quid pro quo, weight for risk. We have added a few items to that original list, as listed in R86. So regardless of how you look at this, consider that the the compressor is on board and all rules apply. If you move the compressor off board, all the rules still apply but you are taking the risk that you run out of air.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi