|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Battery connector.....
Quote:
Also if a grounded frame was passing current, you have the even bigger issue of a positive line shorting to the frame as well. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Battery connector.....
The same amount of current leaves (red) the battery as enters (black). Either could have melted, the red just gave first
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Battery connector.....
What I mean is, if your frame is 'grounded', it has the same potential of the negative terminal on the battery. No current should flow across it unless something with a positive potential is also shorted to the frame.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Battery connector.....
Agreed. Just because your chassis is grounded doesn't mean you're going to have battery melting problems. Heck, the chassis of most cars and airplanes are grounded and those batteries don't melt....well not usually (I'm looking at you lithium-ion...)
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Battery connector.....
I do not know if there were grounding issues with either robot, but neither robot acted erratically at any time (one of them was competing in an off-season).
We know that one of them was drawing significant drivetrain current because the frame re-bent. Our 2011 robot crate was dropped while loading on it's way to the championship and the frame bent, but we hammered it straight at CMP. It re-bent at the Kettering Kickoff off-season, and melted 2 battery connectors in the same day. The replacement connector was taken from a battery as we did not have spares (they had never failed before). The other robot was a practice robot. We geared it a bit too high, and practiced with it very hard. Eventually we added large KOP fans (the metal kind that were in the kit for a few years) to the drive motors to help them cool down (the CIM motor wires were getting very hot). The front roller was also very lossy so we threw more motors at it to get it to a reasonable speed (we had a 'joe johnson style' cross feed roller using bevel gears). The robot in general was a power hog without any additional issues. The main breaker should have tripped if we were using too much current, it did not. During the 2012 comp season, we tripped the main breaker 3 times, then started cooling the main breaker using a cold bag of washers (set in a cooler of dry ice between matches), and replaced the battery cable to prevent failures at MSC. The point is there are robot use cases that can melt the battery connector BEFORE the main breaker trips. This is a SAFETY ISSUE. Even if we are drawing too much current, the whole point of the main breaker is to open before any major safety issues happen. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Battery connector.....
A simple check w/ a multi-meter will tell the tale. (But I know it happened, and our Ohmmeter did not lie...There was resistance present). Removed that screw, no resistance present. No more frame grounding issue
All I can tell you is; Removing the very unnecessary grounding screw on the blunt flat end of the CRIO cured up the frame ground issue immediately. The CRIO is powered by a regulated 24V power supply from the PD Board and am told by many since the incident (we have not before or since melted any of our Anderson connectors 2.5 minutes or hours), should never touch the frame (or ground to the chassis). That screw is chromed and unpainted. (And now completely gone from all of our Team CRIO's). Go to this link; Scroll down to the Pic below "Attach To Robot" (where they instruct teams to attach your completed Control system boards to the robot). http://wpilib.screenstepslive.com/s/...m#!prettyPhoto Now, make that pic larger using the symbol lower right, look at the flat end of the CRIO in the left part of the pic. You will see the grounding screw I am talking about on the right hand side. (And that one is actually very close to that frame itself though not actually touching it in the pic, but could very easily later). Ours was caused by a hasty reinstall by 2 very tired students is all. http://wpilib.screenstepslive.com/s/...dware-overview "The PD provides a regulated 24V power supply to power the cRIO, a special, regulated 12V power supply for powering the robot radio and a 5V power supply for powering an Axis camera." Are you absolutely sure it could not possibly have caused that? We know why that screw grounded to frame, and we know it cured up our issue, that bot still sits in our shop and still runs today. And did the rest of that day. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Battery connector.....
Nirvash,
Ever taken a No Good CRIO apart that has been used on a competition bot before? One that has been drilled on for a season or 2, etc.....Alum. flakes are everywhere on the surface of the board. I didn't actually check that screw to see if there was any positive current present w/ the battery connected...The battery was already out and in hand when we received the bot back at the pit. I was only saying check it first. Thousands of hours of runtime, and only a few failures, points away from the Anderson Connectors in my mind is all. The most costly failures I have seen so far have been caused by a wayward staple (from the back of a bumper), down in a sidecar crossing about 10 pins, and some magic smoking motors turned to actual flame. But 2 major items that will frame ground are that CRIO and the rear grounding lug if used for mounting on the older cameras. Though Jags & CAN I am not at all happy with since it cost us big 2 years ago repeatedly. I'd bet Texas Instruments could tell us why that screw is even there. Last edited by cglrcng : 01-02-2014 at 02:17. Reason: Added last line. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|