|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC488 2014 Robot Rendering
Are you worried about weight with an octocanum? Our team tried it a few years back and it was insanely heavy and complicated
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC488 2014 Robot Rendering
After a decent amount of designing, octocanum can be somewhat light, our my teams octocanum is around 28 lbs (this includes frame, wheels, pistons, modules, gearboxes, and cims). I think 488's octocanum should be a bit lighter than that because they are using custom one stage gearboxes, plastic 4 inch mecanum wheels, and their metal for their modules are a bit thinner than ours so I can see this being around 25 lbs.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC488 2014 Robot Rendering
Quote:
Quote:
Our first foray into the octocanum drive in 2011 -- and one of the first octocanum drives -- was nearer to 60 lbs., so this is a marked improvement. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC488 2014 Robot Rendering
Madison, I see a potential 3 ball auto???
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: FRC488 2014 Robot Rendering
#teamtwosidedpickup
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|