Go to Post I hope I can do something as awesome as Curiosity when I'm older.. - rachelholladay [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:22
Chadfrom308's Avatar
Chadfrom308 Chadfrom308 is offline
Slave to the bot
AKA: Chad Krause
FRC #0308 (The Monsters)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Novi
Posts: 272
Chadfrom308 is a splendid one to beholdChadfrom308 is a splendid one to beholdChadfrom308 is a splendid one to beholdChadfrom308 is a splendid one to beholdChadfrom308 is a splendid one to beholdChadfrom308 is a splendid one to beholdChadfrom308 is a splendid one to behold
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Right now we weigh around 116-117lbs

Our frame without anything on it is only 10 lbs

We have 6 cims and 4 mini cims, 3 banebots or andymarks(I cant remember) and a compressor

I thought we would be way over, but we designed our robot to be as light as possible

We just have to add Plexiglas around the sides for sponsors and a couple of lights

I hope we stay under!

BTW, 6 cims on your drivetrain is definitely an advantage, I would also take them off last.

Aslo: Maybe swiss cheese your robot? Ours is swiss cheesed for two reasons:
Save weight and to have somewhere for cables to run
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:33
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is online now
Electrical/Programming Mentor
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,738
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Weighed ours on Saturday, and I was surprised how much it weighed - 120lbs exactly, with a battery on board. Our proposed solution: 13lb steel block
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:34
Exla357's Avatar
Exla357 Exla357 is offline
Certified Joystick Pusher
FRC #0159 (Alpine Robotics)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 30
Exla357 will become famous soon enoughExla357 will become famous soon enough
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

We're currently less than 90 pounds. That's right. 84.7 pounds. Four CIM, eight wheel tank drive.

Our secret?

HOLES.

A. Crap. Ton. Of. Holes.

Look's like we'll need to find ways to ADD weight this year.

lololol
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 10:12
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,050
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

So, last year we were ditching wire guides at competition to get under the weight limit, so we at 4464 were admittedly a bit apprehensive about weight this year.

However, we weighed our robot, sans compressor, tanks, solenoids, and electrical board for the first time last night. Came in at 67 lbs. We've got a 6-CIM drive, two PG188's, one RS550, and four 1.5'' bore, 8'' stroke cylinders. We are very pleased. About half of our superstructure is 1/16'' aluminum tube, and the other half is 1/8''. We've actually overbuilt a lot of our mechanisms, it's just that our design is very simple and doesn't call for all that much actual stuff.

Here's a pic:

__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016

Last edited by Oblarg : 11-02-2014 at 10:15.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 10:43
DELurker DELurker is offline
Former Engineering Mentor
AKA: William Lydick
no team (n/a)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Delaware, US
Posts: 268
DELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant future
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadfrom308 View Post
We just have to add Plexiglas around the sides for sponsors and a couple of lights
Hoping you mean Lexan/polycarbonate/Makrolon... Plexiglas is prone to shattering.
__________________
----------------------------------------------
With 1370 --
2012 Rutgers District Event Champions with 1676/56
2012 Lenape District Event Finalists with 2191/1691

2013 TCNJ District Event QuarterFinalists with 1143/4750, Gracious Professionalism Award
2013 Bridgewater-Raritan District Event Semi-Finalists with 4285/223
2013 MAR Championship Finalists (Backup) with 222/11/1403; Gracious Professionalism Award
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 10:48
BBray_T1296's Avatar
BBray_T1296 BBray_T1296 is offline
I am Dave! Yognaut
AKA: Brian Bray
FRC #1296 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 947
BBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Quote:
Originally Posted by DELurker View Post
Hoping you mean Lexan/polycarbonate/Makrolon... Plexiglas is prone to shattering.
Regolith.

According to our BOM (we don't actually have the whole robot built to weigh it for sure) we are going to clock in at about 110lbs with what we currently have planned.
__________________
If molecular reactions are deterministic, are all universes identical?

RIP David Shafer: you will be missed


Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 10:55
droswell's Avatar
droswell droswell is offline
Registered User
FRC #2370 (iBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rutland, VT
Posts: 67
droswell will become famous soon enoughdroswell will become famous soon enough
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

In 2010 we guessed our weight to be around 110lbs. Never could get it on a scale.

Showed up to the WPI regional and weighed in at 142

Spent the first hours of practice day changing the wheels and drivetrain and cutting everything off. Then measured the frame. It was out of square by 1/4", and wouldn't fit in the box. Spent the rest of the day shortening the frame bu cutting sections out by hand with a hacksaw and re-assembling the robot.

We learned a valuable lesson about being 2" under frame size and ALWAYS weight your bot _before_ showing up to a regional.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 10:59
Christopher149 Christopher149 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0857 (Superior Roboworks) FTC 10723 (SnowBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 1,100
Christopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Weighed ours the other day (with a couple of bumpers on), and the scale read like 80 lbs. It's a decently accurate scale since it tells me I weight ~120 (I do). Also, the bot is essentially done.

We haven't been this underweight since Lunacy.

PS. And it's made of C-channel and 1" 80/20.

Last edited by Christopher149 : 11-02-2014 at 11:06.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 11:03
c.shu's Avatar
c.shu c.shu is offline
Alumni/Mechanical/CAD
AKA: Cole Shumaker
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 122
c.shu is a splendid one to beholdc.shu is a splendid one to beholdc.shu is a splendid one to beholdc.shu is a splendid one to beholdc.shu is a splendid one to beholdc.shu is a splendid one to beholdc.shu is a splendid one to behold
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Last we checked we were sitting at around 103 lbs with everything on the robot.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 11:06
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 5,958
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

One of our students suggested last night that we weigh our robot....so I'm bringing in a scale today. My guess is around 90, we'll see.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 12:05
Anthony Galea's Avatar
Anthony Galea Anthony Galea is offline
Formerly known as 3175student17
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Riverview, Michigan
Posts: 583
Anthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant futureAnthony Galea has a brilliant future
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

We are at 80.1 lbs, with a 6CIM drivetrain, a pickup, and a shooter. We still have to put on a 2 in stroke cylinder, and that shouldn't add too much weight.
__________________
2013-2016: FRC 3175 Knight Vision, student
2014 Center Line District Finalists with 815 and 280
2016 Woodhaven District Winners with 3604 and 6116
2017-?: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 22:05
Master Mac Master Mac is offline
Registered User
FRC #1075
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Whitby
Posts: 5
Master Mac is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Our Robot , yet I=to be named from Team 1075 weight is about 92 lbs all in. We have 4 Cim " not be release " hardly ever seen style of drive with interior tough box gear changes 14 and 24 tooth. we use 2 more cims for shooter our ball, one fisher price for ball pick up along with 2 van motors for the arm mover. base frame id 1by3 tube 1/8 wall, arm is 1x1 channel, removalable shooter frame is 1x2 channel, arm is 1x1 channel and tube. WE control everything with 7 Talons ( Expensive ). I think the secret is our welding student who can held aluminum like no tomorrow. Pics later in the week. Good luck teams.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 23:46
Michael Yeh Michael Yeh is offline
Lead Chief Delphi Lurker & CAD/Mech
FRC #4099
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 21
Michael Yeh is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Our robot hit 110 lbs on a very old bathroom scale today, which is almost exactly what our CAD said. We plan to acquire a better scale, but we had some people with known weights "calibrate" that one. Our structure is pretty simple but is mostly heavy 2x1x.125" tubing and we're using all 6 CIMs, 4 miniCIMs, and a pair of AM 9015s on the PG-71 gearboxes (no, we don't plan to pop the breaker every match )

The tubing is mostly solid so we may try to make some sort of jig to swiss cheese our unbagged parts. Life would probably have been much easier if we used the thinner Vex tubing, but they were out of stock until the day we placed our order. We may also switch out the miniCIMs with banebots motors in versaplanetaries or CIMiles if we can afford it.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-02-2014, 20:44
piersklein piersklein is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 64
piersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the rough
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

Rookie team here and we WAY over built (the team takes durability way too firmly). We are at 110lbs and do not shoot. We are using 3 by 1.5 in double extrusion for arms which weigh in at 50 lbs. And do not have much to save weight in. On the plus side, we can *accidentally* be a battering ram.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-02-2014, 15:09
Master Mac Master Mac is offline
Registered User
FRC #1075
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Whitby
Posts: 5
Master Mac is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser

And if we ever meet on the field I sure hope you are full of Gracious Professionalism, because this comment is not what first is about, and as a rookie team you will not go far with this type of comment. I wish if I was a robot inspector in your regional you never make it to the field if I had seen this post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by piersklein View Post
Rookie team here and we WAY over built (the team takes durability way too firmly). We are at 110lbs and do not shoot. We are using 3 by 1.5 in double extrusion for arms which weigh in at 50 lbs. And do not have much to save weight in. On the plus side, we can *accidentally* be a battering ram.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:18.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi