Go to Post The [FIRST Robotics] competition is a friendly / gentleman's sort of sport... It is only a forum to put our machines to the test, and see how well we did against what WE set out to do -- not to see which team can build the best robot. - KenWittlief [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 08:23
TheKeeg's Avatar
TheKeeg TheKeeg is offline
Michigan Tech Engineering
AKA: Keegan Harrington
FRC #0068 (Truck Town Thunder)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Ortonville, Michigan
Posts: 77
TheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud of
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Okay, this is something that we came up with at the beginning of build season but never used it (blocking is not in our strategy). The perfect blocker would be a large pole mounted on the edge of a lazy-susan turn table. When you wanted to block you have a motor turning the table and the previously small rod now takes up close to three ball widths (or more) Couple this with rapid robot movement and it could become a very effective blocker.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...IXJv_Fw3vy9vRv

The table could look like this and you mount the pole on one of the corners. (the table would obviously be bigger).
Figured I would share the idea for anyone who wants a blocker. What do ya' think?
__________________

Keegan Harrington
Truck Town Thunder
2013-2014: Mechanical Design

"Infinity: you empty out all of the coffee and there is still more orange juice"
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:28
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,885
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohrly? View Post
My team put a LOT of consideration into the idea, but ultimately the mentors vetoed the dedicated goalie.

You can find an animation here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=408YXf6kGJ0

The idea is up for grabs if you can build it in a week...

PM me if you want a detailed .blend file.
Really creative design, I like it. If made it probably would have been one of the best goalies out there.

However, it would have suffered from the same Achilles Heel as every other goalie robot out there: counter-defense. All it would take is one robot parking sideways in the goalie zone to block the goalie from moving through the goalie zone quickly. the goalie would either have to push the counter-d robot sideways as fast as the shooting robot could re-position and shoot; or retract its blocking extension, drive around the counter-d robot, get back into the goalie zone, and re-deploy its blocking extension before the shooting robot could re-position and shoot.

This is why we did not pursue a goalie design. Defense is important, but a goalie robot is simply too easy to effectively counter.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:35
Nemo's Avatar
Nemo Nemo is offline
Team 967 Mentor
AKA: Dan Niemitalo
FRC #0967 (Iron Lions)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 804
Nemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohrly? View Post
My team put a LOT of consideration into the idea, but ultimately the mentors vetoed the dedicated goalie.

You can find an animation here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=408YXf6kGJ0

The idea is up for grabs if you can build it in a week...

PM me if you want a detailed .blend file.
Even though I don't think the goalie strategy is good this year, I like this design. It's quite clever and well thought out.
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:47
gpetilli gpetilli is offline
Registered User
FRC #1559
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victor, NY
Posts: 285
gpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to all
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo View Post
Even though I don't think the goalie strategy is good this year, I like this design. It's quite clever and well thought out.
Unfortunately, it is against the rules.

G12

An ALLIANCE may not POSSESS their opponent’s BALLS. The following criteria define POSSESSION:
1. “carrying” (moving while supporting BALLS in or on the ROBOT),
2. “herding” (repeated pushing or bumping),
3. “launching” (impelling BALLS to a desired location or direction via a MECHANISM in motion relative to the ROBOT),
4. “trapping” (overt isolation or holding one or more BALLS against a FIELD element or ROBOT in an attempt to shield them).
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:51
gpetilli gpetilli is offline
Registered User
FRC #1559
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victor, NY
Posts: 285
gpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to all
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKeeg View Post
Okay, this is something that we came up with at the beginning of build season but never used it (blocking is not in our strategy). The perfect blocker would be a large pole mounted on the edge of a lazy-susan turn table. When you wanted to block you have a motor turning the table and the previously small rod now takes up close to three ball widths (or more) Couple this with rapid robot movement and it could become a very effective blocker.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...IXJv_Fw3vy9vRv

The table could look like this and you mount the pole on one of the corners. (the table would obviously be bigger).
Figured I would share the idea for anyone who wants a blocker. What do ya' think?
A lazy-susan does not help much since you can not have it free spinning.

G12

An ALLIANCE may not POSSESS their opponent’s BALLS. The following criteria define POSSESSION:
1. “carrying” (moving while supporting BALLS in or on the ROBOT),
2. “herding” (repeated pushing or bumping),
3. “launching” (impelling BALLS to a desired location or direction via a MECHANISM in motion relative to the ROBOT),
4. “trapping” (overt isolation or holding one or more BALLS against a FIELD element or ROBOT in an attempt to shield them).
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 09:55
TheKeeg's Avatar
TheKeeg TheKeeg is offline
Michigan Tech Engineering
AKA: Keegan Harrington
FRC #0068 (Truck Town Thunder)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Ortonville, Michigan
Posts: 77
TheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud ofTheKeeg has much to be proud of
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpetilli View Post
A lazy-susan does not help much since you can not have it free spinning.

G12

An ALLIANCE may not POSSESS their opponent’s BALLS. The following criteria define POSSESSION:
1. “carrying” (moving while supporting BALLS in or on the ROBOT),
2. “herding” (repeated pushing or bumping),
3. “launching” (impelling BALLS to a desired location or direction via a MECHANISM in motion relative to the ROBOT),
4. “trapping” (overt isolation or holding one or more BALLS against a FIELD element or ROBOT in an attempt to shield them).
I guess it is a good thing we didn't go with that design.
__________________

Keegan Harrington
Truck Town Thunder
2013-2014: Mechanical Design

"Infinity: you empty out all of the coffee and there is still more orange juice"
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 10:15
ohrly?'s Avatar
ohrly? ohrly? is offline
Griffin Alum
AKA: Colin Poler
FRC #1884 (The Griffins)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: London
Posts: 58
ohrly? is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95 View Post
Really creative design, I like it. If made it probably would have been one of the best goalies out there.

However, it would have suffered from the same Achilles Heel as every other goalie robot out there: counter-defense. All it would take is one robot parking sideways in the goalie zone to block the goalie from moving through the goalie zone quickly. the goalie would either have to push the counter-d robot sideways as fast as the shooting robot could re-position and shoot; or retract its blocking extension, drive around the counter-d robot, get back into the goalie zone, and re-deploy its blocking extension before the shooting robot could re-position and shoot.

This is why we did not pursue a goalie design. Defense is important, but a goalie robot is simply too easy to effectively counter.
We did a lot of analysis, and we found that mathematically, we still benefit our alliance as long as it takes more than two seconds per cycle for this counter-defense robot to get into place (because we slow them down). Actually, we found that if we block a single ball in autonomous, we are pretty much guaranteed a win. Of course, our mentors correctly pointed out that while it is mathematically advantageous, we still have to get picked, and it doesn't look good if we get blocked.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpetilli View Post
Unfortunately, it is against the rules.

G12

An ALLIANCE may not POSSESS their opponent’s BALLS. The following criteria define POSSESSION:
1. “carrying” (moving while supporting BALLS in or on the ROBOT),
2. “herding” (repeated pushing or bumping),
3. “launching” (impelling BALLS to a desired location or direction via a MECHANISM in motion relative to the ROBOT),
4. “trapping” (overt isolation or holding one or more BALLS against a FIELD element or ROBOT in an attempt to shield them).
Well noted. We were more than a little irked with this significant rule change after two weeks. Our prototype was fast enough to lock position before impact, but the struggle was indicating clearly to the referee that the post was stationary.

Last edited by ohrly? : 11-02-2014 at 10:20. Reason: Added specific link to analysis
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 11:27
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,113
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpetilli View Post
3. “launching” (impelling BALLS to a desired location or direction via a MECHANISM in motion relative to the ROBOT)
Emphasis mine.

I think this rule is ambiguous; it can be argued effectively that such a mechanism impels the ball in an arbitrary direction not at all determined or "desired" by the drivers.

It could also be argued that there is a "desired" direction, namely "not towards the goal."

Without a clarification, the legality of such a mechanism is unclear.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 12:24
RaxusPrime's Avatar
RaxusPrime RaxusPrime is offline
Driver and Programming Captain
AKA: Brennen Martin
FRC #3883 (DataBits)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Posts: 15
RaxusPrime is on a distinguished road
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohrly? View Post
We did a lot of analysis, and we found that mathematically, we still benefit our alliance as long as it takes more than two seconds per cycle for this counter-defense robot to get into place (because we slow them down). Actually, we found that if we block a single ball in autonomous, we are pretty much guaranteed a win. Of course, our mentors correctly pointed out that while it is mathematically advantageous, we still have to get picked, and it doesn't look good if we get blocked.



Well noted. We were more than a little irked with this significant rule change after two weeks. Our prototype was fast enough to lock position before impact, but the struggle was indicating clearly to the referee that the post was stationary.
If someone did do this, the launcher wouldn't need to launch an opponents ball. Instead why wouldn't you use that catapult as a possession of your own alliance's ball. Then you would be able to get an assist without having to move. Though I guess that this would only work if an alliance partner that could catch... But still it would be pretty awesome
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 12:43
BBray_T1296's Avatar
BBray_T1296 BBray_T1296 is offline
I am Dave! Yognaut
AKA: Brian Bray
FRC #1296 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 947
BBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpetilli View Post
Unfortunately, it is against the rules.

G12

An ALLIANCE may not POSSESS their opponent’s BALLS. The following criteria define POSSESSION:
1. “carrying” (moving while supporting BALLS in or on the ROBOT),
2. “herding” (repeated pushing or bumping),
3. “launching” (impelling BALLS to a desired location or direction via a MECHANISM in motion relative to the ROBOT),
4. “trapping” (overt isolation or holding one or more BALLS against a FIELD element or ROBOT in an attempt to shield them).
If the post is sliding left/right, this would only be "impelling the ball to a desired location" if the ball were to be deflected significantly left or right. Yes, while an off-center bounce would send the ball off to the side, The major (>>95%) "impulsion" would be caused by a deflection rather than a launch.

I would invoke the "grandmother clause" in this situation. A move like this is pretty clearly a "block" more than anything else (blocking being a deflection).

I think people are way over-thinking the "possession vs defense" side of this game, especially when it comes to goalie. IMHO a robot like this is quite obviously legal, especially because the intent of the device is clear (to move the defense device in front of, not "impel" the ball)
__________________
If molecular reactions are deterministic, are all universes identical?

RIP David Shafer: you will be missed


Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 12:51
Whippet's Avatar
Whippet Whippet is offline
MIT Class of 2020
AKA: Luis Trueba
FRC #4301 (New Tech Narcissists)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 1,187
Whippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond reputeWhippet has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to Whippet
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJ View Post
One could argue "away from the goal" is a desired direction.
This seems useful here.
__________________
2010: FRC 3043, Build Assistant
2011: FRC 3043, Head of Minibot subteam; FLL 12762, Team Captain
2012: FRC 3043, Electrical; FLL 12762, Team Captain; FTC 5670, Team Captain
2013: FRC 4301, Electrical, Team Co-Captain
2014: FRC 4301, Electrical/Programming, Team Co-Captain
2015: FRC 4301, Electrical/Programming, Team Captain
2016: FRC 4301, Chief Technical Officer; FTC 10860, 10861, and 11004: Mentor. Winner, Hub City Regional (3310 & 4063)
Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 13:03
Kevin Leonard Kevin Leonard is offline
Professional Stat Padder
FRC #5254 (HYPE), FRC #20 (The Rocketeers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,254
Kevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohrly? View Post
My team put a LOT of consideration into the idea, but ultimately the mentors vetoed the dedicated goalie.

You can find an animation here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=408YXf6kGJ0

The idea is up for grabs if you can build it in a week...

PM me if you want a detailed .blend file.

I love this robot. It's completely legal, and I really wish you had built it. It's really well thought out and would be an awesome addition to nay alliance, especially if you could truss it from the goalie position.
__________________
All of my posts are my opinion only and do not reflect the views of my associated teams.
College Student Mentor on Team 5254, HYPE - Helping Youth Pursue Excellence
(2015-Present)
Alumni of Team 20, The Rocketeers (2011-2014)
I'm attempting a robotics blog. Check it out at RocketHypeRobotics.wordpress.com Updated 10/26/16
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 13:34
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bEdhEd View Post
From my experience, being offensive wins matches more often than being defensive. I've found that acquiring more points for your own alliance is much more valuable than preventing the other alliance from scoring.
This is incorrect. Logic would show you that preventing an opponent from scoring is exactly the same as scoring the same number of points yourself when it comes to determining who won the match. 0-1 match scores, while boring, count the same as 0-120 scores from a WLT perspective.

However, this changes when you start looking at it from a ranking perspective rather than a winning perspective. Take, for example, years where your second sort was based off of your opponent's score. During those years it was beneficial to allow your opponents to score so long as you could outscore them.

So, what I'm saying is that offense or defense wins matches (it doesn't matter which one) but offense tends to rank higher. Now, the really fun part of the discussion involves the difficulty and risk of effective defense as well as the metagame of the area you are playing. You also need to take into account the difference between effective defense and crappy defense (I'll give you a hint 90% of defense is of the crappy variety, maybe more).
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 13:36
bEdhEd's Avatar
bEdhEd bEdhEd is offline
Design and Drive Team Mentor
AKA: Frank E.G. Shiner
FRC #0701 (The RoboVikes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Fairfield, CA USA
Posts: 502
bEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond reputebEdhEd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Shah View Post
Defense is totally underrated. I can see that defense will be a major part of the game after the ball is passed to your alliance member. You will have nothing else to do while you wait for the robots on your alliance to score for the next ball to be put into play. So I can see defense becoming a big part of the game after these week 1 competitions coming up.
I totally agree that defense is underrated. I'm not saying that defense is not useful. As a drive team mentor, I have to think of defensive strategies, too, and defense can be extremely useful in certain situations, but defense is something that can be done well by many teams at a competition, although some robots are better designed for defense than others.

My point is that as far as I know, high performance teams tend to err on the side of being offensive, because the acquisition of points is solely on one's own alliance alone, and does not depend as much on what the opposing alliance does, compared to being defensive. It's all about who dominates the field strategically, and how well a strategy is planned. This is why I mentioned a good possibility of a very strong offensive team choosing a good goalie. This might give a team an advantage, and it might just make the difference between a win or loss, but defense alone usually will not win a match. There's gotta be some offense along with it. You can have an all offense strategy and win a match, but I don't think you have an all defensive strategy and win, unless the opposing alliance scores nothing, and your alliance earns foul points.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2014, 15:52
BBray_T1296's Avatar
BBray_T1296 BBray_T1296 is offline
I am Dave! Yognaut
AKA: Brian Bray
FRC #1296 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 947
BBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond reputeBBray_T1296 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Any Wicked Awesome Goalies out there ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
This is incorrect. Logic would show you that preventing an opponent from scoring is exactly the same as scoring the same number of points yourself when it comes to determining who won the match. 0-1 match scores, while boring, count the same as 0-120 scores from a WLT perspective.

However, this changes when you start looking at it from a ranking perspective rather than a winning perspective. Take, for example, years where your second sort was based off of your opponent's score. During those years it was beneficial to allow your opponents to score so long as you could outscore them.

So, what I'm saying is that offense or defense wins matches (it doesn't matter which one) but offense tends to rank higher. Now, the really fun part of the discussion involves the difficulty and risk of effective defense as well as the metagame of the area you are playing. You also need to take into account the difference between effective defense and crappy defense (I'll give you a hint 90% of defense is of the crappy variety, maybe more).
I completely agree with this. If your scouting system fails to appreciate the value of defense in a single piece game like this, you are setting yourself up for an outright spanking when you pass up that total shutdown defensive bot in eliminations because they have no OPR.
If a robot is able to effectively seal off one side of the field (or simply deflect even as low as 25% of shots) it doesn't matter how far you can shoot, or how well you can catch, if you struggle to end a cycle, even mediocre robots will take the banner away from you.

Points not being awarded to your opponent are subtly points being added to your own score. If you can slow down the other alliance such that they can only complete one less cycle per match, that effectively gives you an entire cycle's points worth of a head-start on them.

Matches are only ~2 minutes long, and when your 20fps shooter fires a ball right into the awaiting goalie post of the other robot, it is going to go flying in some direction, wasting precious seconds. If a defensive bot can deflect even as low as 2 shots per match, I wholeheartedly believe that they will significantly hinder your score.

Also take it psychologically: from a driver perspective (as a former driver), getting your shots blocked is very frustrating, in the heat of a match nothing makes you madder than an effective defensive robot hindering your progress. As you get angry you stop thinking clearly, only digging yourself deeper. Even the most trained and level-headed drivers will face the pressure of constantly being shut down.

This makes me wish we had made a defensive bot this year.
__________________
If molecular reactions are deterministic, are all universes identical?

RIP David Shafer: you will be missed


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:45.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi