Go to Post It doesn't matter if you write a thousand lines of code for a robot, if you didn't teach and/or inspire the HS students as you did it then you are not a mentor. - JamesBrown [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-02-2014, 01:43
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,814
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Throwing Problems/Motors

Quote:
Originally Posted by stretch851 View Post
So besides changing the pulley ratio, how much would the numbers change if we changed our gearbox ratio to 5:95? I'm sorry but I couldn't follow how you produced all your calculations.
5:95 is 1:19 gearbox, which is an overdrive gearbox (increase speed, decrease torque) and will not help anything.

I think you meant to say 95:5, or 19:1.

Let's walk through the math (I'll try to keep it simple).

You have 8.45:1 and 1:1 ratios. These combine by multiplication to a 8.45:1 overall ratio. Note that a 1:1 ratio just means that you're moving the same power to a different place (ignoring efficiency losses). Take the CIM free speed (without load), and divide that by the ratio (8.45) to get the current theoretical RPM of the shooter. (Torque gets multiplied by the same ratio.) Using circle math, you can compute a linear speed for the tip, as well as force on the arm (and ball, by Newton's First Law) and the torque applied.

But, we know that an 8.45:1 reduction just isn't enough. What BBray suggested was to change the 1:1 reduction to a 3:1 or a 5:1, something like that. Using a 3:1 reduction (3x the teeth on the pulleys where the arm flips) results in (8.45*3): (1*1), or 25.35:1. Run through the numbers again for that reduction.

I'm sure someone can go more in depth at another time with gearing theory, but this should get you started.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk


Last edited by EricH : 12-02-2014 at 01:46.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi