Go to Post Being Wrong Late is the number one killer of FIRST aspirations. - Joe Johnson [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 08:37
Jason Haaga Jason Haaga is offline
Registered User
no team (Royal Assault)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Philly, PA/Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 38
Jason Haaga is an unknown quantity at this point
A stacker repents...

I was wrong about stacking. The UTC scrimmage shed some light on the major problems with it...

1) Grabbing an individual box out of the huge mass is near impossible. Throw in a couple robots trying to move through it all and it's downright impossible.
2) Many stackers made the assumption they would be able to find boxes in one particular orientation, or require lining up very precisely to grab them. That just doesn't work.

I still, however, stand by defending the top as a near-impossible task as well. We aren't the most powerful team out there, but we were able to muscle up through much stronger teams thanks to the lowered traction on the platform and the angle of attack the ramp gives you. Teams frequently swapped positions back and forth fighting over the top.
Simply, the challenge this year is the challenge itself, not your opponents. FIRST has given us a couple of options to approach the game, and neither is anywhere close to easy.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 10:10
matt111 matt111 is offline
Registered User
#1024 (McKenzie Kilabytes)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: indianapolis, IN
Posts: 171
matt111 will become famous soon enough
we solved that problem and we can pick up any box, in any orientation!

Micheal picked a good design, now that its finished
__________________
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 10:29
Brett W Brett W is offline
Registered User
#0843 (WYVERNS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 59
Brett W is on a distinguished road
we have an even better solution we can pick up any box except ones that are right side up
__________________
Brett
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 10:40
Solace's Avatar
Solace Solace is offline
Head Hurts. Coffee. More. Now!
AKA: Jake
#0571 (Team Paragon)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 569
Solace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Solace
no one's doubting your ability to pick up boxes. The problem is that there is not nearly enough time to do it, and - if you do pursue the boxes for stacking purposes - you would have to momentarily ignore the rest of the action in the match. This is suicide.

Take it from us. We have an excellent stacker that can quickly pick boxes up in any orientation. At the UTC scrimmage, we didn't use it at all in the Finals, and with a little help from RAGE (ok, a lot), we won the whole thing without losing a single round.

the winners this year aren't necessarily the ones who control the ramp (although that is helpful), but the ones who are adept at shoving around the bins. And remember.....

Strategy is everything
__________________
...What is a man,
If the chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep, and tool? A nerd, no more.

2004 UTC New England #2 seed
2004 UTC New England Champions with 716 & 230
2004 Archimedes #2 seed, undeafeated in Qualifiers (for what its worth)


Jake
Team Paragon #571
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 11:11
RossT RossT is offline
Registered User
#0401
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 2
RossT is an unknown quantity at this point
So, for those of you who attended the scrimmage, could you estimate the average stack height per match and maybe the tallest stack you saw? Or was stacking literally impossible?

Also, did the stackers at least provide a decent diversion so that one of the opponent's bots was completely occupied during the match?
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 11:34
Solace's Avatar
Solace Solace is offline
Head Hurts. Coffee. More. Now!
AKA: Jake
#0571 (Team Paragon)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 569
Solace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Solace
during one of the qualifying amatches, one bot put a stack of two on top of a human player stack of three. another bot made a stack of two, and another one put 1 on top of a human player stack of three. that is all i remember.
__________________
...What is a man,
If the chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep, and tool? A nerd, no more.

2004 UTC New England #2 seed
2004 UTC New England Champions with 716 & 230
2004 Archimedes #2 seed, undeafeated in Qualifiers (for what its worth)


Jake
Team Paragon #571
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 11:47
mikeL 177's Avatar
mikeL 177 mikeL 177 is offline
Registered User
#0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 7
mikeL 177 is an unknown quantity at this point
stacking

i was at the UTC scrimmage as well, and it seems that the human player period is going to be more important than i thought. the stacks of four that are put up during the human player period are, for the most part, the only stacks that will get that high. it's always been my opinion that the only bots that will really be able to stack well are the ones that stack internally and drop whole stacks when they're done. since most teams (for what i've seen) havent dont that, i think that we will be seeing suprisingly little stacking throughout the game. most of it will be worrying about QP's and getting on the ramp at the end. for example, at one point in the scrimmage, my team actually had to ram our alliance partner to stop them from taking boxes from our opponents, a move which would have caused us to lose a large amount of QP's. it needs to be known that QP's are based on the other alliance's score too, and for that reason, sometimes leaving the opponent's stacks up is important. so, dont just go shooting out to knock down other stacks. all teams need to discuss that part of the strategy.
__________________
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 19:59
Joel J's Avatar
Joel J Joel J is offline
do you..
no team
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,445
Joel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by matt111
we solved that problem and we can pick up any box, in any orientation!

Micheal picked a good design, now that its finished
We can also pick up a box in any orientation, and stack. In fact, our grabbers rotate so the boxes are either lid up or lid down depending on how we pick up the box. We don't have to be perfectly aligned with the box to pick it up. The problem arose, as Jason said, when there are large amounts of boxes in our zone, for it is impossible to get to an individual box without scattering all the other boxes. Scattering all the boxes just to grab one could work against a stacker, for some of the scattered boxes will settle in a no score zone and be valueless. Stacking may work if done another way, however, but that is for me to know and others to discover..
__________________
Joel Johnson

Division By Zero (229) Alumni, 2003-2007
RAGE (173) Alumni, 1999-2003
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 21:14
sevisehda's Avatar
sevisehda sevisehda is offline
Registered User
#0666
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 215
sevisehda is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to sevisehda
I think the point of this post is for the the people who were at the UTC scrimage to relay what they saw and experienced. Every year people get their idea of what will happen and what is important. Now that there have been some rounds played what actually is important and what rounds are like is known. There are some very competitive UTC teams. So for some people to say they can do something is pointless unless they've played the game with 3 other bots. I thank the people who share experiences about the UTC scrimage and others around the country because now teams can modify there bot to pick up crates and think of new strategys.

Did anyone keep track of average scores?
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 22:33
Solace's Avatar
Solace Solace is offline
Head Hurts. Coffee. More. Now!
AKA: Jake
#0571 (Team Paragon)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 569
Solace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Solace
hmmmmmmmmmmm................ i really don't know
I know that we had an average of 35 or so by the end, and we were ranked 11th. this is considerable when you realize that we couldn't actually move for most of the qualification matches - a problem we didn't solve till finals.

the biggest difference this year is that when you win, you win, and when you lose, you LOSE. big time. the difference between the winning and losing qp's tends to be around 70 or so in a good match.
__________________
...What is a man,
If the chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep, and tool? A nerd, no more.

2004 UTC New England #2 seed
2004 UTC New England Champions with 716 & 230
2004 Archimedes #2 seed, undeafeated in Qualifiers (for what its worth)


Jake
Team Paragon #571
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 22:55
Daniel Brim's Avatar
Daniel Brim Daniel Brim is offline
It's hard hat time here in Boston
AKA: DFB
FRC #0125 (NUTRONS)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 938
Daniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel Brim has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Daniel Brim
I just got back from the Chatsworth scrimmage. We saw the same thing. We do have a solution to flip sideways boxes right-side-up. Not a single team stacked successfully.

Overall, stacking would require sheer teamwork and a fast stacker. I don't know how we can do (4 secs per box, up to 12 in 48 secs.) Our stacker was not working because it was not all the way programmed.

I now see more of a reason to gamble and try for a stack of 8 in human player mode, or at least a stack of six.

Good Luck All
__________________
2003 (2002) - 2006 -- Team 294, Beach Cities Robotics
2007 (2006) - Present -- Team 125, NUTRONS
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-02-2003, 02:16
ahecht's Avatar
ahecht ahecht is offline
'Luzer'
AKA: Zan
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Billerica, MA
Posts: 978
ahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to ahecht Send a message via AIM to ahecht Send a message via Yahoo to ahecht
Re: stacking

Quote:
Originally posted by mikeL 177
i was at the UTC scrimmage as well, and it seems that the human player period is going to be more important than i thought.
I also noticed that very few teams were actually able to get their human players off the field in under 10 seconds at UTC. The scoring system wasn't set up to disable autonomous for those teams, but many teams who sucessfully used autonomous mode(including Rage) wouldn't have been enabled had the arena controller been functioning correctly.
__________________
Zan Hecht

Scorekeeper: '05 Championship DaVinci Field/'10 WPI Regional
Co-Founder: WPI-EBOT Educational Robotics Program
Alumnus: WPI/Mass Academy Team #190
Alumnus (and founder): Oakwood Robotics Team #992


"Life is an odd numbered problem the answer isn't in the back of the book." — Anonymous WPI Student
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-02-2003, 10:59
Shawn60 Shawn60 is offline
Registered User
#0060 (Bionic Bulldogs)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingman, Az
Posts: 86
Shawn60 will become famous soon enough
How fast were teams making it to the stack on the ramp?
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-02-2003, 11:15
Solace's Avatar
Solace Solace is offline
Head Hurts. Coffee. More. Now!
AKA: Jake
#0571 (Team Paragon)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 569
Solace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Solace
Re: Re: stacking

Quote:
Originally posted by ahecht
I also noticed that very few teams were actually able to get their human players off the field in under 10 seconds at UTC. The scoring system wasn't set up to disable autonomous for those teams, but many teams who sucessfully used autonomous mode(including Rage) wouldn't have been enabled had the arena controller been functioning correctly.
actually, one of the latest team updates changed the human player period to 15 seconds. most of the human players got off of the field in time.
__________________
...What is a man,
If the chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep, and tool? A nerd, no more.

2004 UTC New England #2 seed
2004 UTC New England Champions with 716 & 230
2004 Archimedes #2 seed, undeafeated in Qualifiers (for what its worth)


Jake
Team Paragon #571
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-02-2003, 11:24
Chris Hibner's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Chris Hibner Chris Hibner is offline
Eschewing Obfuscation Since 1990
AKA: Lars Kamen's Roadie
FRC #0051 (Wings of Fire)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,488
Chris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Re: stacking

Quote:
Originally posted by ahecht
I also noticed that very few teams were actually able to get their human players off the field in under 10 seconds at UTC. The scoring system wasn't set up to disable autonomous for those teams, but many teams who sucessfully used autonomous mode(including Rage) wouldn't have been enabled had the arena controller been functioning correctly.
I made a post stating this about 10 days ago and I was scoffed at by everyone. I mentioned that human players would need to practically dive for the mats in order to make it back in time and that it might cause an injury concern. Everyone told me that getting back in time would be EASY and that we must be doing something wrong. Interesting ...

Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised to see the 10 seconds get bumped up to 15 seconds. I hope it does.

-Chris
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Stacker James114 General Forum 26 01-07-2003 11:10
pic: Another unsed stacker, wings down CD47-Bot Robot Showcase 11 30-04-2003 21:36
how many of u actually used the stacker if u had one? HolyMasamune General Forum 21 14-04-2003 13:12
Image Discuss: Team 753 Working on the Stacker CD47-Bot Robot Showcase 2 22-02-2003 01:05
Stacker with a vacuum Miles General Forum 15 17-01-2003 23:35


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:17.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi