|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Just imagine two different robots touching the other two balls in the starting config. Then it becomes quite legal.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
The two robots don't even have to be touching the balls.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Well I'm greedy and I want those bonus movement points as well.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Oops! Misread G5. Thanks for pointing this out.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
First of all - this is a great multi-ball auto mode!
By my reading of G5, this starting staging (in the video) would be valid only if the red ball were not touching the robot. (It's hard to tell if this is the case). Also, the only way to still have the 5 points for the other two alliance partners is to have them start in the white zone, one touching the red and the other the blue ball. If the red ball is not touching the robot, and the alliance partners were no-shows or in the goalie zone, it would be legal. - Mr. Van Coach, Robodox |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
The red ball was not touching the robot in this test.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
You might want to check that. It's a bit ambiguous, but it appears that an auton ball has to be placed touching a robot to be 'loaded' on the field. The exception is for goalie bots as there ball has the option to be placed anywhere in the white zone on your side of the truss as long as it's not in direct contact with another robot already loaded (or in contact) with their own ball. So, for this to work, at least how most everyone I've talked to has interpretted it, is that one of the balls will have to be in bumper contact with another alliance partner and not in contact with the shooting robot and the other robot would be able to be placed in the goalie zone. Or, if they prefer, also in bumper contact with the other ball.
I'm not misinterpretting the rules, am I? If so, please, someone clarify that for me. Thanks! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
but check out that kid at the end doe
much excite. #ejshuffle |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Our pneumatics expert (the guy filming) ran around the gym screaming for a solid 15 seconds after this test.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Quote:
But besides that, awesome job on doing a 3 ball auto, my only question is how repeatable is it? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Very impressive. Any plan for the third ball rolling left/right instead of straight forward?
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Why is that?
G5: Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2601 Three Ball Auton Teaser
This is awesome!
My question, how consistently can you line up those three balls to push in the right direction/roll to the desired locations? From my experience with the practice scrimmages this weekend, getting balls to settle in the perfect spot is hard, plus each ball is unique in inflation and shape. Seems like this approach is highly dynamic. Are you using any feedback to make ball acquisition more consistent? Regardless, very impressive and unique approach to the three ball auto problem, well done! -Mike |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|