|
|
|
 it doesn't matter so much why i joined [FIRST], but that i stayed :D - sure_smile [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| it doesn't matter so much why i joined [FIRST], but that i stayed :D - sure_smile [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#15
22-02-2014, 10:15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rookie Awards Ethics Question
The easy way to tell if FIRST has been satisfied that the new team meets all the rookie criteria is the team number that they are assigned.
This year for instance, Rookies are only those teams with numbers 4900 and higher. They are the only teams eligible for rookie awards. New "veteran" teams, like 193 was last year (rookie #'s started at 4450 last year), are given new team numbers that are below this year's 4900, usually a never been assigned number that is close to any associated parent/sibling team number. None of these new teams are eligible for rookie awards of course. This year we have 388 rookies eligible for awards and 10 new veteran teams not eligible for rookie awards. Not eligible new teams: 265 746 1285 1786 3134 3886 4413 4415 4416 4418 4524 Last edited by Mark McLeod : 23-02-2014 at 08:02. Reason: Because I cannot transcribe - lost another team today too, forgot 1285 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode