'Trivial' Posession allowed?

[jvriezen]

Originally Posted by BBray_T1296

Don't try to lawyer your way into a few extra points after a match. The ref's decision is correct unless proven incorrect. It is more than likely that you will have little to no way of actually proving your case, and if the ref says "no" to your argument then you don't get the points. period. Make your intent obvious during a match and you will be rewarded with a much less stressful weekend.

Just to clarify... My reason for the post was not that I wanted to try any of these things specifically. I can certainly see teams that routinely collaborate recognizing scenario 1 as a valid way to get two ASSISTs without the ball hitting the floor or being 'tossed' in a manner subject to losing control. The other scenarios were just included to see how far people think that envelope can be pushed.

In fact, if a ball is 'trapped' between three bots, all traveling down field together, I would say that is a clearly valid way to get three ASSISTS (assuming all three zones traversed) Think of three mecanum bots forming a triangle cavity between them. When they get to the scoring zone, one of them picks up the ball and shoots.