Go to Post I'm so conflicted right now. On one hand, you made the same page as a celebrity. On the other hand.... Justin Bieber. - Akash Rastogi [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-03-2014, 22:15
David8696's Avatar
David8696 David8696 is offline
I.A.A.R. Lord
AKA: David Bluhm
FRC #2485 (W.A.R.Lords)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 137
David8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud ofDavid8696 has much to be proud of
Re: San Diego: Tech Foul in Finals

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
Please look at G32--that was called out on the webcast. The announcer also stated that the red ball was used by the human player to deflect the blue ball--which would indicate a definite violation of G32.

This is entirely separate from a robot Possessing a ball--Possession, in that sense, is a property that only Robots can have.
As a lead member of the strategy team of Team 2485, I can tell you exactly what transpired (or at least what we could gather from the video and a number of eyewitness accounts):

Our human player was attempting to inbound the ball to 987. When he threw the ball to the robot, it bounced away, and ended up effectively "trapping" the Blue Alliance's ball. This was ruled as in violation of G32—"Strategies employing TEAM member actions to deflect opponents’ BALLS are not allowed"—incurring a technical foul on our human player. Similar events had occurred earlier in the tournament, and had been uncalled.

Suffice it to say that we were exceedingly upset by this ruling; but at the same time, we recognize that once the refs determine something to be the case, that's kind of the way it goes. It's a tough, tough pill to swallow, and one we're definitely not convinced was necessary, but at least we'll get another chance in Vegas. We just wish the final outcome didn't have to be decided either way by a controversial call.

EDIT: Just to clarify, there was no intentional—and certainly no "strategic"—deflection, possession, or contact of any kind by our human player with the blue alliance's ball.

Last edited by David8696 : 08-03-2014 at 22:33. Reason: Additional information
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:33.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi