|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is it possible to score a ball without POSSESSing it?
The last robot in contact with the ball before it entered the goal was not a member of the blue alliance, so the ball does not meet the criteria for being scored.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is it possible to score a ball without POSSESSing it?
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is it possible to score a ball without POSSESSing it?
Quote:
Otherwise, goalie blocked shots would not count either. Section 3.1.4 Scoring An opponent ROBOT that contacts, but fails to stop a BALL from going over the TRUSS or in a GOAL has not caused either of these actions and does not invalidate the SCORE. -Clinton- |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is it possible to score a ball without POSSESSing it?
Where in the rules does it say that?
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is it possible to score a ball without POSSESSing it?
My apologies. I was quite certain that an alliance robot had to be the last thing to contact the ball before it went over the truss or through the goal in order for it to count, but obviously I was mistaken. I think I misread (or misremembered) the bit about "does not invalidate the SCORE" as being the opposite of what it says. The "without intervening TEAM member contact" probably got mixed up with it in my head as referring to robots rather than humans.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|