Week2 cumulative Twitter stats & OPRs

[Ether]

Originally Posted by MrRiedemanJACC

Per our previous conversation, I am assuming most teams from Gull Lake aren't represented very well in this because of the lack of twitter data? (I'm thinking 2054 should be pretty far up there on OPR)

What does the pronoun "this" refer to? Your post is linked to Post8, which does not show individual team OPRs at all.

??

[Robotmmm]

Is there a way to denote that teams that attended week 1 Mount Olive District had matches played that were 20 seconds short?

[Ether]

Originally Posted by Robotmmm

Is there a way to denote that teams that attended week 1 Mount Olive District had matches played that were 20 seconds short?

I think you just did

On the other hand, if what you meant was "somehow factor that into the statistical calculations to account for the anomaly", I'm not sure it would be possible to obtain a consensus agreement among CDers concerning a statistically valid way to do that.

[Robotmmm]

That is why I said denote. There is no easy way to change the stats. Just talking about an asterisk type scenario.

[MisterJ]

I'm sure the answer to this has been posted and discussed a million times, and I apologize... but is Hatboro-Horsham missing?

[Ether]

Originally Posted by MisterJ

I'm sure the answer to this has been posted and discussed a million times, and I apologize... but is Hatboro-Horsham missing?

Sorry. There is no Twitter for Hatboro-Horsham (PAHAT). This usually means there were internet problems at the venue.

Many folks would like to see the Twitter data saved on the local FMS computer* until it can be archived and made accessible to teams doing scouting and for students interested in statistics who would like to analyze the data.

Ask around and see if there's anyone on your team who has any influence within FIRST. Maybe he or she can get the attention of someone at FIRST who has the interest and authority to make a constructive change.

* instead of being deleted at the end of the event

[MrRiedemanJACC]

Ahh yes sorry. I was referring to the excel file in your post #7 in this thread.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by MrRiedemanJACC

Ahh yes sorry. I was referring to the excel file in your post #7 in this thread.

There are only 16 Qual matches in the Twitter data for Gull Lake.

But that results in OPR scores which are lower than they would otherwise be only if those 16 matches were lower-scoring matches compared to the ones which are not in Twitter data.

Of course, if GullLake turns out to be a relatively high-scoring event compared to future events that teams from Gull Lake participate in, then the higher-scoring matches missing from the Twitter data will affect the OPR going forward for those teams.

In the case of 2054, their OPR from the incomplete Twitter data appears to be higher than from the (complete) MatchResults data.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forum/sho....php?p=1356165