|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week2 cumulative Twitter stats & OPRs
I'm sure the answer to this has been posted and discussed a million times, and I apologize... but is Hatboro-Horsham missing?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week2 cumulative Twitter stats & OPRs
Quote:
Many folks would like to see the Twitter data saved on the local FMS computer* until it can be archived and made accessible to teams doing scouting and for students interested in statistics who would like to analyze the data. Ask around and see if there's anyone on your team who has any influence within FIRST. Maybe he or she can get the attention of someone at FIRST who has the interest and authority to make a constructive change. * instead of being deleted at the end of the event |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week2 cumulative Twitter stats & OPRs
Ahh yes sorry. I was referring to the excel file in your post #7 in this thread.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week2 cumulative Twitter stats & OPRs
Quote:
But that results in OPR scores which are lower than they would otherwise be only if those 16 matches were lower-scoring matches compared to the ones which are not in Twitter data. Of course, if GullLake turns out to be a relatively high-scoring event compared to future events that teams from Gull Lake participate in, then the higher-scoring matches missing from the Twitter data will affect the OPR going forward for those teams. In the case of 2054, their OPR from the incomplete Twitter data appears to be higher than from the (complete) MatchResults data. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forum/sho....php?p=1356165 Last edited by Ether : 12-03-2014 at 22:38. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|