Week3 cumulative Twitter stats & OPRs

[Ether]

Red wins 1935; Blue wins 1722; Ties 26

based on Twitter Qual and Elim match data as of Sun 16 Mar 2014 15:32:18 ET.

The usual Twitter data caveats apply.

[Coach Norm]

Originally Posted by Ether

Red wins 1935; Blue wins 1722; Ties 26

based on Twitter Qual and Elim match data as of Sun 16 Mar 2014 15:32:18 ET.

The usual Twitter data caveats apply.

Does this include eliminations? If so, that would make sense.

[MikeE]

Originally Posted by Coach Norm

Does this include eliminations? If so, that would make sense.

The long term trends have been that Qual performance for red is 50% and elimination is ~65%.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by MikeE

The long term trends have been that Qual performance for red is 50% and elimination is ~65%.

Elims only: red wins 415 (66.8%); blue wins 206 (33.2%); ties 3

Quals only: red wins 1520 (50.1%); blue wins 1516 (49.9%); ties 23

Twitter data 3/16 15:32:18

[Joseph1825]

I thought I understood what these numbers meant, but I'm confused, so could someone explain somthing to me? I'm with team 1825 and the spreadsheet says we have an OPR of over 80 points (the blue alliance agrees.) but our CCWM is -40, could someone explain what those number mean? Thanks.

[dodar]

I dont think you took out duplicate matches from replays.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by dodar

I dont think you took out duplicate matches from replays.

Are you addressing Joseph1825 or me?

[dodar]

Originally Posted by Ether

Are you addressing Joseph1825 or me?

You.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by dodar

You.

Your post had no context, and it was linked to Joseph1825's post #20.

Could not tell to whom the pronoun "you" was referring.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by dodar

I dont think you took out duplicate matches from replays.

"The usual Twitter data caveats apply"

Twitter data is known to have omissions and redundancies and possibly a few errors.

[dodar]

Originally Posted by Ether

"The usual Twitter data caveats apply"

Twitter data is known to have omissions and redundancies and possibly a few errors.

Then this truly isnt the correct OPR calculations.

And your post before said I linked my other post to that Joseph's post, but I did so such thing.

[Ether]

Originally Posted by dodar

your post before said I linked my other post to that Joseph's post, but I did so such thing.

Perhaps unknowingly, but yes you did.

[dodar]

You are reading that wrongly. That shows me posting after him. If you look to see that one of your posts comes all the way down from mine, that is one where you respond directly to me.

All I did was click Post Reply at the very bottom of the page.

[myork]

Is the twitter data any different from the FRC-Spy data?

[GearsOfFury]

Originally Posted by Ether

Unpenalized Winning Margin Histogram

based on Twitter Qual match data as of Sat 15 Mar 2014 20:13:09 ET.

The usual Twitter data caveats apply.

The bi-modal nature of this graph is really very surprising to me. I cannot think of why there would be such a discrete break around 0... What am I missing?

Great graph, in any case! Thank you for posting it.